Agreement in central corneal thickness measurement between Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer

被引:4
|
作者
Salouti, Ramin [1 ,2 ]
Razeghinejad, Reza [3 ]
Masihpour, Nasrin [1 ]
Ghoreyshi, Maryam [2 ,4 ]
Nowroozzadeh, M. Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Poostchi Clin, Zand St, Shiraz 7134997446, Iran
[2] Salouti Eye Clin, Salouti Cornea Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Wills Eye Hosp & Res Inst, Glaucoma Serv, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Agreement; Central corneal thickness; Corvis ST; Ocular response analyzer; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; HYPERTENSION TREATMENT; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; NONCONTACT; TOPOGRAPHY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-020-01436-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the agreement and interchangeability of noncontact devices of ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST in central corneal thickness measurement. Methods In this prospective comparative study, central corneal thickness (CCT) readings of 284 healthy, nonglaucoma subjects, without previous ocular surgery, were measured with ORA and Corvis ST. Only data from right eyes were analyzed. The mean values of CCT measurements by the ORA versus Corvis ST were compared with the paired sample t test. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) were used to assess the agreement between the measurements of the two devices. Results The mean (+/- standard deviation) age of the participants was 28.0 +/- 4.9 years, and 36.6% were male. The mean CCT measurements were 555 +/- 32 mu m by the ORA and 536 +/- 32 mu m with the Corvis ST (P < 0.001). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.964 (P < 0.001). The 95% LOA between the ORA and the Corvis ST was 2.2 to 35.9 mu m. Conclusions The ORA measured the CCT up to 35.9 mu m greater than Corvis ST. Therefore, the two devices may not be used interchangeably for measuring CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:2563 / 2567
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters
    Bao, FangJun
    Huang, ZiXu
    Huang, JinHai
    Wang, JunJie
    Deng, ManLi
    Li, LinNa
    Yu, AYong
    Wang, QinMei
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (06) : 510 - 519
  • [32] Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes
    Annette, Hager
    Kristina, Loge
    Bernd, Schroeder
    Mark-Oliver, Fuellhas
    Wolfgang, Wiegand
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (05) : 361 - 365
  • [33] Differences and Limits of Agreement among Pentacam, Corvis-ST, and IOL-Master 700 Optical Biometric Devices regarding Central Corneal Thickness Measurements
    Rajabi, Sattar
    Asharlous, Amir
    Riazi, Abbas
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    Moalej, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 34 (01): : 44 - 49
  • [34] Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as an Instrument for Measurement of Intraocular Pressure and Corneal Biomechanics
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Joda, Akram
    Abass, Ahmed
    Garway-Heath, David
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2015, 40 (11) : 1111 - 1119
  • [35] Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
    Rao, Harsha Laxmana
    Pahuja, Shivani
    Murthy, Somasheila I.
    Senthil, Sirisha
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (05) : 1010 - 1010
  • [36] Measurement of corneal biomechanical properties in diabetes mellitus using the Corvis ST
    Ohn, Kyoung
    Noh, Young Ho
    Moon, Jung Il
    Jung, Younhea
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (36) : E30248
  • [37] Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes
    Yong Li
    Zhiqiang Xu
    Qiaoli Liu
    Yuzhou Wang
    Kan Lin
    Jiahui Xia
    Shihao Chen
    Liang Hu
    Eye and Vision, 8
  • [38] Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer
    Kirwan, Caitriona
    O'Keefe, Michael
    Lanigan, Bernadette
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (06) : 990 - 992
  • [39] Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes
    Li, Yong
    Xu, Zhiqiang
    Liu, Qiaoli
    Wang, Yuzhou
    Lin, Kan
    Xia, Jiahui
    Chen, Shihao
    Hu, Liang
    EYE AND VISION, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [40] IOP measurement and central corneal thickness
    Stodtmeister, R
    Kron, M
    Gaus, W
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (01) : 120 - 121