Comparative biomechanical compression testing with a new implant for vertebral body replacement

被引:0
|
作者
Knop, C [1 ]
Lange, U [1 ]
Bastian, L [1 ]
Oeser, M [1 ]
Blauth, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Unfallchirurg Klin, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 2001年 / 104卷 / 01期
关键词
thoracolumbar spine; vertebral body replacement; titanium implant; compression test; biomechanics; bone mineral density;
D O I
10.1007/s001130050684
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The authors present a new titanium implant for replacement of the vertebral body (Synex(TM)). Possible indications would be fractures or dislocations with destruction of the anterior column, posttraumatic kyphosis as well as tumors in the throracolumbar spine. The construction has to be completed by a stabilizing implant. For best fit and contact to adjacent end-plates Synex(TM) is distractable in situ. The possibility of secondary dislocation or loss of correction should thereby be minimised. Objectives. We performed comparative compression tests with Synex(TM) and MOSS(TM) ("Harms mesh cage") on human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1). The aim of the study was to measure the compressive strength of the vertebral body end-plate in uniaxial loading via both implants to exclude a caving of Synex(TM) in vivo. Methods. 12 human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1) were divided in 2 similar groups (matched pairs) according to bone mineral density (BMD), determined using DE-QCT. The specimens were loaded with axial compression force at a constant speed of 5 mm/min to failure and the displacement was recorded with a continuous load-displacement curve. Results. The mean ultimate compression force (F-max) showed a tendency towards a higher result testing Synex(TM) with 3396 N versus 2719 N (non significant). The displacement until F-max was 2.9 mm in group 5 (Synex(TM)), which was half as long as in group M (5.8 mm). The difference was significant (p<0.001). The compression force was twice as high and significantly (p<0.05) higher with Synex(TM) at a displacement of 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm.A significant (p<0.001) correlation (R=0.89) between F-max and BMD was found. Conclusions. Synex(TM) was found to be at least comparable to MOSS(TM) for suspensory replacement of the vertebral body at the thoracolumbar spine. A possible consequence of the significantly higher mean compression forces between 1 and 2 mm displacement might be a decreased segmental deformation or loss of correction.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical Testing of a 3D-printed L5 Vertebral Body Model
    Bohl, Michael A.
    Morgan, Clinton D.
    Mooney, Michael A.
    Repp, Garrett J.
    Lehrman, Jennifer N.
    Kelly, Brian P.
    Chang, Steve W.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Kakarla, U. Kumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [42] Vertebral body replacement with a bioglass-polyurethane composite in spine metastases - clinical, radiological and biomechanical results
    Schulte, M
    Schultheiss, M
    Hartwig, E
    Wilke, HJ
    Wolf, S
    Sokiranski, R
    Fleiter, T
    Kinzl, L
    Claes, L
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (05) : 437 - 444
  • [43] Vertebral body replacement with a bioglass-polyurethane composite in spine metastases – clinical, radiological and biomechanical results
    M. Schulte
    M. Schultheiss
    E. Hartwig
    H.-J. Wilke
    S. Wolf
    R. Sokiranski
    T. Fleiter
    L. Kinzl
    L. Claes
    European Spine Journal, 2000, 9 : 437 - 444
  • [44] A novel artificial vertebral implant with Gyroid porous structures for reducing the subsidence and mechanical failure rate after vertebral body replacement
    Peng Shang
    Benyuan Ma
    Guanghui Hou
    Yihai Zhang
    Lunxu Cui
    Wanzhen Song
    Yancheng Liu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [45] A novel artificial vertebral implant with Gyroid porous structures for reducing the subsidence and mechanical failure rate after vertebral body replacement
    Shang, Peng
    Ma, Benyuan
    Hou, Guanghui
    Zhang, Yihai
    Cui, Lunxu
    Song, Wanzhen
    Liu, Yancheng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [46] A New Vertebral Body Replacement Strategy Using Expandable Polymeric Cages
    Liu, Xifeng
    Paulsen, Alex
    Giambini, Hugo
    Guo, Ji
    Miller, A. Lee, II
    Lin, Po-Chun
    Yaszemski, Michael J.
    Lu, Lichun
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2017, 23 (5-6) : 223 - 232
  • [47] Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery
    Kandziora, F
    Schnake, KJ
    Klostermann, CK
    Haas, NP
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2004, 107 (05): : 354 - +
  • [49] STABILIZATION OF ACRYLIC VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT
    WILKINSON, HA
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1985, 24 (01): : 83 - 86
  • [50] Sintering prophylaxis of a vertebral body replacement
    Geiger, F.
    Kafchitsas, K.
    Rauschmann, M.
    ORTHOPADE, 2010, 39 (07): : 699 - 703