Comparative biomechanical compression testing with a new implant for vertebral body replacement

被引:0
|
作者
Knop, C [1 ]
Lange, U [1 ]
Bastian, L [1 ]
Oeser, M [1 ]
Blauth, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Unfallchirurg Klin, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 2001年 / 104卷 / 01期
关键词
thoracolumbar spine; vertebral body replacement; titanium implant; compression test; biomechanics; bone mineral density;
D O I
10.1007/s001130050684
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The authors present a new titanium implant for replacement of the vertebral body (Synex(TM)). Possible indications would be fractures or dislocations with destruction of the anterior column, posttraumatic kyphosis as well as tumors in the throracolumbar spine. The construction has to be completed by a stabilizing implant. For best fit and contact to adjacent end-plates Synex(TM) is distractable in situ. The possibility of secondary dislocation or loss of correction should thereby be minimised. Objectives. We performed comparative compression tests with Synex(TM) and MOSS(TM) ("Harms mesh cage") on human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1). The aim of the study was to measure the compressive strength of the vertebral body end-plate in uniaxial loading via both implants to exclude a caving of Synex(TM) in vivo. Methods. 12 human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1) were divided in 2 similar groups (matched pairs) according to bone mineral density (BMD), determined using DE-QCT. The specimens were loaded with axial compression force at a constant speed of 5 mm/min to failure and the displacement was recorded with a continuous load-displacement curve. Results. The mean ultimate compression force (F-max) showed a tendency towards a higher result testing Synex(TM) with 3396 N versus 2719 N (non significant). The displacement until F-max was 2.9 mm in group 5 (Synex(TM)), which was half as long as in group M (5.8 mm). The difference was significant (p<0.001). The compression force was twice as high and significantly (p<0.05) higher with Synex(TM) at a displacement of 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm.A significant (p<0.001) correlation (R=0.89) between F-max and BMD was found. Conclusions. Synex(TM) was found to be at least comparable to MOSS(TM) for suspensory replacement of the vertebral body at the thoracolumbar spine. A possible consequence of the significantly higher mean compression forces between 1 and 2 mm displacement might be a decreased segmental deformation or loss of correction.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical Comparison of Kyphoplasty Versus a Titanium Mesh Implant With Cement for Stabilization of Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Upasani, Vidyadhar V.
    Robertson, Claire
    Lee, Deborah
    Tomlinson, Tucker
    Mahar, Andrew T.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : 1783 - 1788
  • [22] An instrumented implant for vertebral body replacement that measures loads in the anterior spinal column
    Rohlmann, Antonius
    Gabel, Udo
    Graichen, Friedmar
    Bender, Alwina
    Bergmann, Georg
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2007, 29 (05) : 580 - 585
  • [23] An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine.: A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies
    Reinhold, M.
    Schmoelz, W.
    Canto, F.
    Krappinger, D.
    Blauth, M.
    Knop, C.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2007, 110 (04): : 327 - 333
  • [24] Biomechanical comparative evaluation of percutaneous fixations with vertebral expansion for vertebral compression fractures: an experimental and finite element study
    Lucas, Le Gallo
    Lucas, V. P. C. Lima
    Sylvain, Persohn
    Agathe, Nerot
    Marc-Antoine, Rousseau
    Laurie, Simon
    Wafa, Skalli
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 25 (05) : 487 - 498
  • [25] Effect of different fixation methods on biomechanical property of cervical vertebral body replacement and fusion
    Zhang, Dong-Xiang
    Guo, Li-Xin
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 101
  • [26] Biomechanical studies of transthoracic vertebral body replacement with autologous bone grafts (fibula and rib)
    Kaden, B
    Koch, W
    VarchminSchultheiss, K
    Wunsch, M
    Fuhrmann, G
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 19 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [27] Biomechanical analysis of a new expandable vertebral body replacement combined with a new polyaxial antero-lateral plate and/or pedicle screws and rods
    Ulmar, Benjamin
    Erhart, Stefanie
    Unger, Stefan
    Weise, Kuno
    Schmoelz, Werner
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (03) : 546 - 553
  • [28] Biomechanical analysis of a new expandable vertebral body replacement combined with a new polyaxial antero-lateral plate and/or pedicle screws and rods
    Benjamin Ulmar
    Stefanie Erhart
    Stefan Unger
    Kuno Weise
    Werner Schmoelz
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 546 - 553
  • [29] Comparative Study of Percutaneous Vertebral Body Perforation and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Yokoyama, K.
    Kawanishi, M.
    Yamada, M.
    Tanaka, H.
    Ito, Y.
    Hirano, M.
    Kuroiwa, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) : 685 - 689
  • [30] Vertebral body replacement in vertebral column surgery
    Krettek, C
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2004, 107 (05): : 353 - 353