Biomechanical Testing of a 3D-printed L5 Vertebral Body Model

被引:24
|
作者
Bohl, Michael A. [1 ]
Morgan, Clinton D. [1 ]
Mooney, Michael A. [1 ]
Repp, Garrett J. [2 ]
Lehrman, Jennifer N. [1 ]
Kelly, Brian P. [1 ]
Chang, Steve W. [1 ]
Turner, Jay D. [1 ]
Kakarla, U. Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurol, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
3d printing; bone mineral density; pedicle screw; spine biomechanics; synthetic bone model; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; PEDICLE SCREW; PULLOUT STRENGTH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.3893
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background We examined the biomechanical performance of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed vertebra on pedicle screw insertional torque (IT), axial pullout (APO), and stiffness (ST) testing. Materials and methods Seventy-three anatomically identical L5 vertebral body models (146 pedicles) were printed and tested for IT, APO, and ST using single-threaded pedicle screws of equivalent diameter (6.5 mm), length (40.0 mm), and thread pitch (2.6 mm). Print properties (material, cortical thickness [number of shells], cancellous density [in-fill], in-fill pattern, print orientation) varied among models. One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the effects of variables on outcomes. Results The type of material significantly affected IT, APO, and ST (P < 0.001, all comparisons). For acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) models, in-fill density (25-35%) had a positive linear association with APO (P = 0.002), ST (P = 0.008), and IT (P = 0.10); similarly for the polylactic acid (PLA) models, APO (P = 0.001), IT (P < 0.001), and ST (P = 0.14). For the nylon material type, in-fill density did not affect any tested parameter. For a given in-fill density, material, and print orientation, the in-fill pattern significantly affected IT (P = 0.002) and APO (P = 0.03) but not ST (P = 0.23). Print orientation also significantly affected IT (P < 0.001), APO (P < 0.001), and ST (P = 0.002). Conclusions 3D-printed vertebral body models with specific print parameters can be designed to perform analogously to human bone on pedicle screw tests of IT, APO, and ST. Altering the material, in-fill density, in-fill pattern, and print orientation of synthetic vertebral body models could reliably produce a model that mimics bone of a specific bone mineral density.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D-printed clamps as a novel technique to fixate spine specimens for biomechanical testing
    Cornaz, Frederic
    Farshad, Mazda
    Fasser, Marie-Rosa
    Spirig, Jose
    Snedeker, Jess
    Widmer, Jonas
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2019, 149 : 24S - 24S
  • [2] Biomechanical properties of 3D-printed bone models
    Andrzejewska, Angela
    BIOSYSTEMS, 2019, 176 : 52 - 55
  • [3] Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel 3D-Printed Movable Lumbar Vertebral Complex for Replacement: In Vivo and Biomechanical Evaluation of Goat Model
    Zhang, Feng
    Liu, Jiantao
    He, Xijing
    Wang, Rui
    Lu, Teng
    Zhang, Ting
    Liu, Zhiyu
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [4] Does the shape of the L5 vertebral body depend on the height of CT slices in the pedicle? Evaluation of the shape of the L5 vertebral body with a multicut CT scan
    Alfonso, Matias
    Palacio, Patricia
    Bastarrika, Gorka
    Villas, Carlos
    SPINE, 2008, 33 (01) : E1 - E5
  • [5] 3D-printed vertebral body for anterior spinal reconstruction in patients with thoracolumbar spinal tumors
    Zhou, Hua
    Liu, Shanshan
    Li, Zhehuang
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    Dang, Lei
    Li, Yan
    Li, Zihe
    Hu, Panpan
    Wang, Ben
    Wei, Feng
    Liu, Zhongjun
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 37 (02) : 274 - 282
  • [6] The Barrow Biomimetic Spine: Comparative Testing of a 3D-Printed L4-L5 Schwab Grade 2 Osteotomy Model to a Cadaveric Model
    Bohl, Michael A.
    Mooney, Michael A.
    Repp, Garrett J.
    Cavallo, Claudio
    Nakaji, Peter
    Chang, Steve W.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Kakarla, U. Kumar
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (04):
  • [7] Biomechanical Behavior of a 3D-Printed Denture Base Material
    Cantelli, Viviane
    Brito, Vitor Trancoso
    Collares, Fabricio Mezzomo
    Della Bona, Alvaro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 : S109 - S117
  • [8] Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
    Bohl, Michael A.
    McBryan, Sarah
    Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
    Lehrman, Jennifer N.
    Kelly, Brian P.
    Nakaji, Peter
    Chang, Steve W.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Kakarla, U. Kumar
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (04) : 419 - 424
  • [9] Reliability Testing of 3D-Printed Polyamide Actuators
    Kasap, Gokce
    Gokdel, Yigit Daghan
    Yelten, Mustafa Berke
    Ferhanoglu, Onur
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEVICE AND MATERIALS RELIABILITY, 2020, 20 (01) : 152 - 156
  • [10] WHAT IS 3D-PRINTED BODY ARCHITECTURE? INTRODUCTION
    Leach, Neil
    ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2017, 87 (06) : 6 - 15