Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Zhibin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohong [3 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guangyu [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Guyu [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Long [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Panzhihua, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optical surface imaging; Setup error; Process capability index; Exponentially weighted moving average; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC). Methods: Taking the patients' positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient. Results: Outlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index Cpk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (Cpk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients. Conclusion: SPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface-Guided Radiation Therapy Error Assessment: Impact of Surface Discrepancies in Breast Cancer Patients
    Tehrani, J. Nasehi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (09) : 6639 - 6640
  • [2] Surface-guided setup and intrafraction motion in free-breathing breast cancer radiation therapy
    Kirkegaard, Trine O.
    Jensen, Ingelise
    Kristensen, Thomas O.
    Milo, Marie Louise H.
    Nielsen, Martin S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3994 - S3996
  • [3] The frequency of surface-guided repositioning for head and neck cancer patients
    Holst, Simona I.
    Andersen, Maria
    Jakobsen, Annette R.
    Nielsen, Martin S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4187 - S4189
  • [4] Evaluation of initial patient setup methods for breast cancer between surface-guided radiation therapy and laser alignment based on skin marking in the Halcyon system
    Seonghee Kang
    Hyeongmin Jin
    Ji Hyun Chang
    Bum‑Sup Jang
    Kyung Hwan Shin
    Chang Heon Choi
    Jung-in Kim
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [5] Accuracy of Patient Setup in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Surface-Guided Radiotherapy - A Comparative Analysis
    Vivekanandan, A.
    Chaudhary, S.
    Aashita, A.
    Amritt, A.
    Ghosh, A.
    Dagar, A.
    Maiti, A.
    Hazarika, S.
    Raj, J.
    Sharma, A.
    Kamboj, K.
    Kumar, A.
    Sharma, J.
    Sharma, D. N.
    Mallick, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : E195 - E196
  • [6] Evaluation of initial patient setup methods for breast cancer between surface-guided radiation therapy and laser alignment based on skin marking in the Halcyon system
    Kang, Seonghee
    Jin, Hyeongmin
    Chang, Ji Hyun
    Jang, Bum-Sup
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Choi, Chang Heon
    Kim, Jung-in
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [7] Surface-guided radiation therapy for breast cancer: more precise positioning
    A. González-Sanchis
    L. Brualla-González
    C. Fuster-Diana
    J. C. Gordo-Partearroyo
    T. Piñeiro-Vidal
    T. García-Hernandez
    J. L. López-Torrecilla
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2021, 23 : 2120 - 2126
  • [8] Surface-guided radiation therapy for breast cancer: more precise positioning
    Gonzalez-Sanchis, A.
    Brualla-Gonzalez, L.
    Fuster-Diana, C.
    Gordo-Partearroyo, J. C.
    Pineiro-Vidal, T.
    Garcia-Hernandez, T.
    Lopez-Torrecilla, J. L.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (10): : 2120 - 2126
  • [9] Performance assessment of the surface-guided radiation therapy system: Varian Identify
    Ayrancioglu, Oguzhan
    Ayrancioglu, Ceren
    Arikan, Serife Ceren
    Alicikus, Lutfiye Zumre Arican
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [10] Application of surface-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer: comparative analysis of differences with skin marking- guided patient setup
    Lee, Jaeha
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Goh, Youngmoon
    Yang, Eunyeong
    Kim, Ha Un
    Song, Si Yeol
    Kim, Young Seok
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 41 (03): : 172 - 177