Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Zhibin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohong [3 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guangyu [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Guyu [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Long [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Panzhihua, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optical surface imaging; Setup error; Process capability index; Exponentially weighted moving average; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC). Methods: Taking the patients' positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient. Results: Outlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index Cpk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (Cpk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients. Conclusion: SPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of residual setup errors for anatomical sub-structures in image-guided head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy
    Djordjevic, Milos
    Sjoholm, Emmelie
    Tullgren, Owe
    Sorcini, Bruno
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (05) : 646 - 653
  • [32] Psychosocial Referral and Help Seeking in Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy
    Ellis, J.
    Ehrlich, R.
    Malfitano, C.
    Jones, J.
    Maunder, R.
    Ringash, J.
    Carneiro, C.
    Withers, R.
    Atenafu, E.
    Rodin, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 526 - 526
  • [33] Assessment of a Predictive Score for Indications of Prophylactic Enteral Nutrition in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients Treated by Radiation Therapy or Chemoradiation Therapy
    Lescut, N.
    Nguyen, F.
    Personeni, E.
    Puyraveau, M.
    Desmarets, M.
    Hamlaoui, R.
    Servagi, S.
    Bosset, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S470 - S470
  • [34] Impact of patient setup error in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Prabhakar, Ramachandran
    Laviraj, Macherla A.
    Haresh, Kunhi Parambath
    Julka, Pramod K.
    Rath, Goura K.
    PHYSICA MEDICA, 2010, 26 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [35] Impact of patient setup error in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Prabhakar, R.
    Ganesh, T.
    Haresh, K. P.
    Rath, G. K.
    Senthamizhchclvan, S.
    Joshi, R. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S462 - S462
  • [36] Surface-Guided Patient Setup Versus Traditional Tattoo Markers for Radiation Therapy: Is Tattoo-Less Setup Feasible for Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis Treatment?
    Zhao, Hui
    Paxton, Adam
    Sarkar, Vikren
    Price, Ryan G.
    Huang, Jessica
    Su, Fan -Chi Frances
    Li, Xing
    Rassiah, Prema
    Szegedi, Martin
    Salter, Bill
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [37] ASSESSMENT OF DOSE TO BREAST TISSUE DURING HEAD AND NECK CANCER RADIATION THERAPY
    Both, S.
    Novak, J.
    Dutta, P.
    Kassaee, A.
    Bar Ad, V.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S251 - S251
  • [38] Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer During Superstorm Sandy
    Grew, D.
    Sanfilippo, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 492 - 492
  • [39] Using an onboard kilovoltage imager to measure setup deviation in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck patients
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Hunt, Margie A.
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Hong, Linda X.
    Ling, C. Clifton
    Amols, Howard I.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 8 (04): : 28 - 44
  • [40] Assessment of Surface Guided Radiation therapy in Breast cancer: An Indian Experience
    Barthwal, M.
    Pareek, V.
    Yadav, J.
    Ms, S.
    Bisht, R. K.
    Patil, P.
    Sharma, A.
    Sharma, D. N.
    Sharma, S., V
    Mallick, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S874 - S874