Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Zhibin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohong [3 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guangyu [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Guyu [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Long [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Panzhihua, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optical surface imaging; Setup error; Process capability index; Exponentially weighted moving average; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC). Methods: Taking the patients' positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient. Results: Outlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index Cpk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (Cpk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients. Conclusion: SPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical practicality and patient performance for surface-guided automated VMAT gating for DIBH breast cancer radiotherapy
    Huijskens, Sophie
    Granton, Patrick
    Fremeijer, Kimm
    van Wanrooij, Cynthia
    Offereins-van Harten, Kirsten
    Schouwenaars-van den Beemd, Suzanne
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    Sattler, Margriet G. A.
    Penninkhof, Joan
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 195
  • [42] Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy
    Lowther, Nicholas J.
    Hamilton, David A.
    Kim, Han
    Evans, Jamie M.
    Marsh, Steven H.
    Louwe, Robert J. W.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9 : 21 - 27
  • [43] Evaluation of Daily Patient Position Accuracy and Calculation of Setup Errors with Skin Markers and Surface-Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) in Breast Cancer
    Bakicierler, G.
    Celik, O. Karakoyun
    Sindir, B.
    Can, O. Duran
    Akgungor, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E641 - E641
  • [44] Comparison of Palliative Radiation Therapy Regimens for Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
    Alshehri, S. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S194 - S194
  • [45] Setup margin for head-and-neck cancer patients receiving 2D-2D and 3D image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Kovacs Peter
    Szita Evelin
    Schvarcz Kitti
    Kamu Szabolcs
    Kalincsak Judit
    Kovacs Arpad
    Repa Imre
    Hadjiev Janaki
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (29) : 1193 - 1200
  • [46] Patient-Reported Outcomes-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Weppler, Sarah
    Quon, Harvey
    Schinkel, Colleen
    Yarschenko, Adam
    Barbera, Lisa
    Harjai, Nabhya
    Smith, Wendy
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [47] Surface Guided Radiation Therapy as a Replacement for Patient Marks in Treatment of Breast Cancer
    Herron, E.
    Murray, M.
    Hilton, L.
    Goldstein, T.
    Ogunleye, T. B.
    Bailey, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E492 - E493
  • [48] PREDICTORS OF SEVERE ACUTE AND LATE TOXICITIES IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER TREATED WITH RADIATION THERAPY
    Meyer, Francois
    Fortin, Andre
    Wang, Chang Shu
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Bairati, Isabelle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (04): : 1454 - 1462
  • [49] Randomized trial on two types of thermoplastic masks for patient immobilization during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer
    Sharp, L
    Lewin, F
    Johansson, H
    Payne, D
    Gerhardsson, A
    Rutqvist, LE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (01): : 250 - 256
  • [50] Image Guided Radiation Therapy in Head-and-Neck Cancer: Static Dose Versus Dynamic Volumes - The Need for Adaptive Innovation
    Mullapally, S. K.
    Mohanti, B. K.
    Rath, G. K.
    Laviraj, M. A.
    Subramani, V.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Kumar, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S482 - S482