Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Zhibin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohong [3 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guangyu [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Guyu [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Long [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Panzhihua, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optical surface imaging; Setup error; Process capability index; Exponentially weighted moving average; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC). Methods: Taking the patients' positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient. Results: Outlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index Cpk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (Cpk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients. Conclusion: SPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges of Patient Immobilization and Setup for Head Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
    Yu, N.
    Woody, N.
    Koyfman, S.
    Xia, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E882 - E883
  • [22] The impact of weight loss on setup accuracy for head and neck cancer patients in the era of image guided radiation therapy
    Zia, Sayyad Y.
    Smith, William
    Ozbek, Umut
    Mirza, Awais
    Sheu, Rendi
    Ghafar, Robert
    Gupta, Vishal
    Bakst, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 5 (04) : 359 - 362
  • [23] Assessment of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer patients using daily megavoltage CT imaging
    Duan, J.
    Spencer, S. A.
    Shen, S.
    De Los Santos, J. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S445 - S445
  • [24] Development of automated region of interest selection algorithms for surface-guided radiation therapy of breast cancer
    Cui, Songye
    Li, Guang
    Kuo, Hsiang-Chi
    Zhao, Bo
    Li, Anyi
    Cervino, Laura I.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [25] Can surface guided radiation therapy be used to setup DIBH breast cancer patients to reduce imaging?
    Moreira, A.
    Zamburlini, M.
    Cavelaars, F.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Linsenmeier, C.
    Pytko, I.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (06) : 603 - 603
  • [26] Can surface guided radiation therapy be used to setup DIBH breast cancer patients to reduce Imaging?
    Moreira, A.
    Zamburlini, M.
    Cavelaars, F.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Linsenmeier, C.
    Pytko, I.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S278 - S278
  • [27] Accuracy Comparison Between Surface and Volumetric Registrations for Patient Setup of Head and Neck Radiation Therapy
    Kim, Y.
    Li, R.
    Na, Y.
    Jenkins, C.
    Lee, R.
    Xing, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 207 - 207
  • [28] The Role of Biochemical Markers in Prediction of Radiation Therapy Failure for Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Rutkowski, T.
    Mrochem-Kwarciak, J.
    Maslyk, B.
    Hajduk, A.
    Wygoda, A.
    Lukaszczyk-Widel, B.
    Hejduk, B.
    Hutnik, M.
    Golen, M.
    Skladowski, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S710 - S710
  • [29] Effects of UES Dilatation on Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients Post-Radiation Therapy
    Villegas, B. Capobres
    Zu, Y.
    Ouyoung, L.
    Sinha, U. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S444 - S444
  • [30] A phase II trial of subcutaneous amifostine and radiation therapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer
    Anne, Pramila Rani
    Machtay, Mitchell
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Brizel, David M.
    Morrison, William H.
    Irwin, David H.
    Chougule, Prakash B.
    Estopinal, Noel C.
    Berson, Anthony
    Curran, Walter J., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (02): : 445 - 452