Importance of accurate dose calculations outside segment edges in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:13
|
作者
Schwarz, M [1 ]
Bos, LJ [1 ]
Mijnheer, BJ [1 ]
Lebesque, JV [1 ]
Damen, EMF [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
dose calculation; dose measurements; intensity-inodulated radiation therapy; optimisation;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To assess the effect of differences in the calculation of the dose outside segment edges on the overall dose distribution and the optimisation process of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. Patients and methods: Accuracy of dose calculations of two treatment planning systems (TPS1 and TPS2) was assessed, to ensure that they are both suitable for IMRT treatment planning according to published guidelines. Successively, 10 treatment plans for patients with prostate and head and neck tumours were calculated in both systems. The calculations were compared in selected points as well as in combination with volumetric parameters concerning the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk. Results: For both planning systems, the calculations agree within 2.0% or 3 mm with the measurements in the high-dose region for single and multiple segment dose distributions. The accuracy of the dose calculation is within the tolerances proposed by recent recommendations. Below 35% of the prescribed dose, TPS1 overestimates and TPS2 underestimates the measured dose values, TPS2 being closer to the experimental data. The differences between TPS1 and TPS2 in the calculation of the dose outside segments explain the differences (up to 50% of the local value) found in point dose comparisons. For the prostate plans, the discrepancies between the TPS do not translate into differences in PTV coverage, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values and results of the plan optimisation process. The dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the rectal wall differ below 60 Gy, thus affecting the plan optimisation if a cost function would operate in this dose region. For the head and neck cases, the two systems give different evaluations of the DVH points for the PTV (up to 22% differences in target coverage) and the parotid mean dose (1.0-3.0 Gy). Also the results of the optimisation are influenced by the choice of the dose calculation algorithm. Conclusions: In IMRT, the accuracy of the dose calculation outside segment edges is important for the determination of the dose to both organs at risks and target volumes and for a correct outcome of the optimisation process. This aspect should therefore be of major concern in the commissioning of a TPS intended for use in IMRT. Fulfilment of the accuracy criteria valid for conformal radiotherapy is not sufficient. Three-dimensional evaluation of the dose distribution is needed in order to assess the impact of dose calculation accuracy Outside the segment edges on the total dose delivered to patients treated with IMRT. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 314
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OPTIMIZING THE PLANNING OF INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY
    WEBB, S
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (12): : 2229 - 2246
  • [22] A point dose calculation in Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Chern, SS
    Selvaraj, RN
    Wu, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1265 - 1266
  • [23] Theoretical considerations of monitor unit calculations for intensity modulated beam treatment planning
    Boyer, A
    Xing, L
    Ma, CM
    Curran, B
    Hill, R
    Kania, A
    Bleier, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) : 187 - 195
  • [24] Aperture generation based on threshold segmentation for intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
    Yang, Jie
    Gui, Zhiguo
    Zhang, Liyuan
    Zhang, Pengcheng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1758 - 1770
  • [25] Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning: a dosimetric comparison
    Altaf, Saima
    Iqbal, Khalid
    Akram, Muhammad
    Buzdar, Saeed A.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (04) : 396 - 402
  • [26] Corticospinal tract-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    Sakumi, Akira
    Mukasa, Akitake
    Saito, Kuniaki
    Kunimatsu, Akira
    Masutani, Yoshitaka
    Hanakita, Shunya
    Ino, Kenji
    Haga, Akihiro
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2014, 19 (05) : 310 - 316
  • [27] Effects of multileaf collimator parameters on treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Wu, Vincent W. C.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2007, 32 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [28] A parallel optimisation approach for the realisation problem in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
    Luke R. Mason
    Vicky H. Mak-Hau
    Andreas T. Ernst
    Computational Optimization and Applications, 2015, 60 : 441 - 477
  • [29] A treatment planning inter-comparison of proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy
    Lomax, AJ
    Bortfeld, T
    Goitein, G
    Debus, J
    Dykstra, C
    Tercier, PA
    Coucke, PA
    Mirimanoff, RO
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 51 (03) : 257 - 271
  • [30] A parallel optimisation approach for the realisation problem in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
    Mason, Luke R.
    Mak-Hau, Vicky H.
    Ernst, Andreas T.
    COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 60 (02) : 441 - 477