Importance of accurate dose calculations outside segment edges in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:13
|
作者
Schwarz, M [1 ]
Bos, LJ [1 ]
Mijnheer, BJ [1 ]
Lebesque, JV [1 ]
Damen, EMF [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
dose calculation; dose measurements; intensity-inodulated radiation therapy; optimisation;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To assess the effect of differences in the calculation of the dose outside segment edges on the overall dose distribution and the optimisation process of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. Patients and methods: Accuracy of dose calculations of two treatment planning systems (TPS1 and TPS2) was assessed, to ensure that they are both suitable for IMRT treatment planning according to published guidelines. Successively, 10 treatment plans for patients with prostate and head and neck tumours were calculated in both systems. The calculations were compared in selected points as well as in combination with volumetric parameters concerning the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk. Results: For both planning systems, the calculations agree within 2.0% or 3 mm with the measurements in the high-dose region for single and multiple segment dose distributions. The accuracy of the dose calculation is within the tolerances proposed by recent recommendations. Below 35% of the prescribed dose, TPS1 overestimates and TPS2 underestimates the measured dose values, TPS2 being closer to the experimental data. The differences between TPS1 and TPS2 in the calculation of the dose outside segments explain the differences (up to 50% of the local value) found in point dose comparisons. For the prostate plans, the discrepancies between the TPS do not translate into differences in PTV coverage, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values and results of the plan optimisation process. The dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the rectal wall differ below 60 Gy, thus affecting the plan optimisation if a cost function would operate in this dose region. For the head and neck cases, the two systems give different evaluations of the DVH points for the PTV (up to 22% differences in target coverage) and the parotid mean dose (1.0-3.0 Gy). Also the results of the optimisation are influenced by the choice of the dose calculation algorithm. Conclusions: In IMRT, the accuracy of the dose calculation outside segment edges is important for the determination of the dose to both organs at risks and target volumes and for a correct outcome of the optimisation process. This aspect should therefore be of major concern in the commissioning of a TPS intended for use in IMRT. Fulfilment of the accuracy criteria valid for conformal radiotherapy is not sufficient. Three-dimensional evaluation of the dose distribution is needed in order to assess the impact of dose calculation accuracy Outside the segment edges on the total dose delivered to patients treated with IMRT. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 314
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of voxel size on Monte Carlo dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning
    Mora, G
    Pawlicki, T
    Maio, A
    Ma, CM
    ADVANCED MONTE CARLO FOR RADIATION PHYSICS, PARTICLE TRANSPORT SIMULATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, : 549 - 554
  • [42] Investigation of Surface Dose Using Film Dosimetry and Commercial Treatment Planning System for Larynx Cancer Treatment with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Akbas, Ugur
    Kesen, Nazmiye Donmez
    Koksal, Canan
    Ozkaya, Kubra
    Altun, Musa
    Bilge, Hatice
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [43] The development of a deep reinforcement learning network for dose-volume-constrained treatment planning in prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Sprouts, Damon
    Gao, Yin
    Wang, Chao
    Jia, Xun
    Shen, Chenyang
    Chi, Yujie
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2022, 8 (04)
  • [44] The importance of accurate dose calculation for treatment planning of patients with small lung tumors
    Fippel, M.
    Wiezorek, T.
    Salz, H.
    Schwedas, M.
    Wendt, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2496 - 2496
  • [45] An Exact Method for the Minimum Cardinality Problem in the Treatment Planning of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
    Ernst, Andreas T.
    Mak, Vicky H.
    Mason, Luke R.
    INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2009, 21 (04) : 562 - 574
  • [46] Multiplan treatment-planning framework: A paradigm shift for intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Meyer, Robert R.
    Zhang, Hao H.
    Goadrich, Laura
    Nazareth, Daryl P.
    Shi, Leyuan
    D'Souza, Warren D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (04): : 1178 - 1189
  • [47] Preliminary evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
    Borca, Valeria Casanova
    Radici, Lorenzo
    Petrucci, Edoardo
    Piva, Cristina
    Cante, Domenico
    Pasquino, Massimo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 106
  • [48] A genetic algorithm approach to the inverse problem of treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ahmad, Sabbir U.
    Bergen, Stuart W. A.
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2010, 5 (03) : 189 - 195
  • [49] Knowledge-Based Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer
    Dick, D.
    Das, S.
    Lo, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3965 - 3966
  • [50] Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (05): : 207 - 215