Importance of accurate dose calculations outside segment edges in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:13
|
作者
Schwarz, M [1 ]
Bos, LJ [1 ]
Mijnheer, BJ [1 ]
Lebesque, JV [1 ]
Damen, EMF [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
dose calculation; dose measurements; intensity-inodulated radiation therapy; optimisation;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To assess the effect of differences in the calculation of the dose outside segment edges on the overall dose distribution and the optimisation process of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. Patients and methods: Accuracy of dose calculations of two treatment planning systems (TPS1 and TPS2) was assessed, to ensure that they are both suitable for IMRT treatment planning according to published guidelines. Successively, 10 treatment plans for patients with prostate and head and neck tumours were calculated in both systems. The calculations were compared in selected points as well as in combination with volumetric parameters concerning the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk. Results: For both planning systems, the calculations agree within 2.0% or 3 mm with the measurements in the high-dose region for single and multiple segment dose distributions. The accuracy of the dose calculation is within the tolerances proposed by recent recommendations. Below 35% of the prescribed dose, TPS1 overestimates and TPS2 underestimates the measured dose values, TPS2 being closer to the experimental data. The differences between TPS1 and TPS2 in the calculation of the dose outside segments explain the differences (up to 50% of the local value) found in point dose comparisons. For the prostate plans, the discrepancies between the TPS do not translate into differences in PTV coverage, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values and results of the plan optimisation process. The dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the rectal wall differ below 60 Gy, thus affecting the plan optimisation if a cost function would operate in this dose region. For the head and neck cases, the two systems give different evaluations of the DVH points for the PTV (up to 22% differences in target coverage) and the parotid mean dose (1.0-3.0 Gy). Also the results of the optimisation are influenced by the choice of the dose calculation algorithm. Conclusions: In IMRT, the accuracy of the dose calculation outside segment edges is important for the determination of the dose to both organs at risks and target volumes and for a correct outcome of the optimisation process. This aspect should therefore be of major concern in the commissioning of a TPS intended for use in IMRT. Fulfilment of the accuracy criteria valid for conformal radiotherapy is not sufficient. Three-dimensional evaluation of the dose distribution is needed in order to assess the impact of dose calculation accuracy Outside the segment edges on the total dose delivered to patients treated with IMRT. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 314
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] OAR Dose Distribution Prediction and gEUD Based Automatic Treatment Planning Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Jia, Qiyuan
    Li, Yongbao
    Wu, Aiqian
    Guo, Futong
    Qi, Mengke
    Mai, Yanhua
    Kong, Fantu
    Zhen, Xin
    Zhou, Linghong
    Song, Ting
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 141426 - 141437
  • [12] Dose planning of intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer using compensating filters
    Chu, SS
    Suh, CO
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 2081 - 2081
  • [13] Relationship Between Dose of Distribution and Area of Segment Fields Among Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Planning in Cervix Cancer
    Qiu, R.
    Wang, Y.
    Cao, Y.
    Zhang, R.
    Shang, K.
    Chi, Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 364 - +
  • [14] Evaluation of An Automated Treatment Planning Verification System for Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
    Xiao, L.
    Yin, Y.
    Tong, L. Xiu
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2897 - 2897
  • [15] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Rethinking basic treatment planning paradigms
    Macklis, R
    Weinhous, M
    Harnisch, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02): : 317 - 318
  • [16] A seven-parameter model for independent verification of dose calculations in intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Ceberg, C.
    Nordstroem, F.
    Ramsing, H.
    Johnsson, S.
    Bjoerk, P.
    Baeck, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S182 - S183
  • [17] DPM, a fast, accurate Monte Carlo code optimized for photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning dose calculations
    Sempau, J
    Wilderman, SJ
    Bielajew, AF
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08): : 2263 - 2291
  • [18] Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for dynamic multileaf collimator delivery: influence of different parameters on dose distributions
    Samuelsson, A
    Johansson, KA
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 66 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [19] Measurements and treatment planning calculations of electron dose distributions below bolus edges
    Nygaard, K
    Odland, OH
    Kvinnsland, Y
    Nygaard, B
    Heggdal, J
    Muren, LP
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (02) : 217 - 220
  • [20] Acceleration of intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose calculation by importance sampling of the calculation matrices
    Thieke, C
    Nill, S
    Oelfke, U
    Bortfeld, T
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 676 - 681