The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography

被引:20
|
作者
Mainprize, James G. [1 ]
Tyson, Albert H. [1 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
digital mammography; anatomic noise; breast density; image analysis; CANCER RISK; THICKNESS; IMAGES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4736422
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The appearance of parenchymal/stromal patterns in mammography have been characterized as having a Wiener power spectrum with an inverse power-law shape described by the exponential parameter, beta. The amount of fibroglandular tissue, which can be quantified in terms of volumetric breast density (VBD), influences the texture and appearance of the patterns formed in a mammogram. Here, a large study is performed to investigate the variations in beta in a clinical population and to indicate the relationship between beta and breast density. Methods: From a set of 2686 cranio-caudal normal screening mammograms, the parameter beta was extracted from log-log fits to the Wiener spectrum over the range 0.15-1 min(-1). The Wiener spectrum was calculated from regions of interest in the compression paddle contact region of the breast. An in-house computer program, Cumulus V, was used to extract the volumetric breast density and identify the compression paddle contact regions of the breast. The Wiener spectra were calculated with and without modulation transfer function (MTF) correction to determine the impact of VBD on the intrinsic anatomic noise. Results: The mean volumetric breast density was 25.5% (+/- 12.6%) over all images. The mean beta following a MTF correction which decreased the beta slightly (approximate to-0.08) was found to be 2.87. Varying the maximum of the spatial frequency range of the fits from 0.7 to 1.0, 1.25 or 1.5 mm(-1) showing small decreases in the result, although the effect of the quantum noise power component on reducing beta was clearly observed at 1.5 mm(-1). Conclusions: The texture parameter, beta, was found to increase with VBD at low volumetric breast densities with an apparent leveling off at higher densities. The relationship between beta and VBD measured here can be used to create probabilistic models for computer simulations of detectability. As breast density is a known risk predictor for breast cancer, the correlation between beta and VBD suggests that beta may provide predictive information and this will be investigated in the future. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4736422]
引用
收藏
页码:4660 / 4668
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Heindel, W.
    Heidrich, J.
    Hense, H. -W.
    Heidinger, O.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (07) : 2744 - 2751
  • [32] Breast tissue density and CAD cancer detection in digital mammography
    Li, Lihua
    Wu, Zuobao
    Chen, Li
    George, Florence
    Chen, Zhao
    Salem, Angela
    Kallergi, Maria
    Berman, Claudia
    2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2005, : 3253 - 3256
  • [33] Relationship of Breast Density and Age in a Cohort of Screening Mammography Patients
    Copit, D.
    Gluskin, J.
    Fishman, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [34] Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms
    Alonzo-Proulx, O.
    Jong, R. A.
    Yaffe, M. J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (22): : 7443 - 7457
  • [35] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326
  • [36] Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Ho, Thao-Quyen H.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (02) : 286 - 292
  • [37] Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories
    Tagliafico, A. S.
    Tagliafico, G.
    Cavagnetto, F.
    Calabrese, M.
    Houssami, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 86 (1031):
  • [38] Fully Automated Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Cohen, Eric A.
    Wu, Fang F.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 301 (03) : 561 - 568
  • [39] Volumetric breast density estimation using dual energy digital breast tomosynthesis
    Huang, Hailiang
    Duan, Xiaoyu
    Zhao, Wei
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 11312
  • [40] Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization
    Castillo-Garcia, Maria
    Chevalier, Margarita
    Garayoa, Julia
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Garcia-Pinto, Diego
    Valverde, Julio
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 802 - 810