The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography

被引:20
|
作者
Mainprize, James G. [1 ]
Tyson, Albert H. [1 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
digital mammography; anatomic noise; breast density; image analysis; CANCER RISK; THICKNESS; IMAGES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4736422
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The appearance of parenchymal/stromal patterns in mammography have been characterized as having a Wiener power spectrum with an inverse power-law shape described by the exponential parameter, beta. The amount of fibroglandular tissue, which can be quantified in terms of volumetric breast density (VBD), influences the texture and appearance of the patterns formed in a mammogram. Here, a large study is performed to investigate the variations in beta in a clinical population and to indicate the relationship between beta and breast density. Methods: From a set of 2686 cranio-caudal normal screening mammograms, the parameter beta was extracted from log-log fits to the Wiener spectrum over the range 0.15-1 min(-1). The Wiener spectrum was calculated from regions of interest in the compression paddle contact region of the breast. An in-house computer program, Cumulus V, was used to extract the volumetric breast density and identify the compression paddle contact regions of the breast. The Wiener spectra were calculated with and without modulation transfer function (MTF) correction to determine the impact of VBD on the intrinsic anatomic noise. Results: The mean volumetric breast density was 25.5% (+/- 12.6%) over all images. The mean beta following a MTF correction which decreased the beta slightly (approximate to-0.08) was found to be 2.87. Varying the maximum of the spatial frequency range of the fits from 0.7 to 1.0, 1.25 or 1.5 mm(-1) showing small decreases in the result, although the effect of the quantum noise power component on reducing beta was clearly observed at 1.5 mm(-1). Conclusions: The texture parameter, beta, was found to increase with VBD at low volumetric breast densities with an apparent leveling off at higher densities. The relationship between beta and VBD measured here can be used to create probabilistic models for computer simulations of detectability. As breast density is a known risk predictor for breast cancer, the correlation between beta and VBD suggests that beta may provide predictive information and this will be investigated in the future. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4736422]
引用
收藏
页码:4660 / 4668
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (02): : 362 - 379
  • [42] Automatic breast tissue density estimation scheme in digital mammography images
    Menechelli, Renan C.
    Pacheco, Ana Luisa V.
    Schiabel, Homero
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 10136
  • [43] Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort
    Payne, Nicholas R.
    Hickman, Sarah E.
    Black, Richard
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Hudson, Sue
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 177 - 187
  • [44] Automatic evaluation of breast density for full-field digital mammography
    Lou, SL
    Fan, Y
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 3979 : 1362 - 1369
  • [45] Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: A comparison with film and digital mammography
    Duric, Neb
    Boyd, Norman
    Littrup, Peter
    Sak, Mark
    Myc, Lukasz
    Li, Cuiping
    West, Erik
    Minkin, Sal
    Martin, Lisa
    Yaffe, Martin
    Schmidt, Steven
    Faiz, Muhammad
    Shen, Jason
    Melnichouk, Olga
    Li, Qing
    Albrecht, Teri
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (01)
  • [46] A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography
    Stefanoyiannis, AP
    Costaridou, L
    Sakellaropoulos, P
    Panayiotakis, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (868): : 410 - 420
  • [47] Radiation dose differences between digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are dependent on breast thickness
    Alakhras, Maram M.
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    Bourne, Roger
    Rickard, Mary
    Diffey, Jennifer
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 9783
  • [48] A WEAKLY LABELED APPROACH FOR BREAST TISSUE SEGMENTATION AND BREAST DENSITY ESTIMATION IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Ben-Ari, Rami
    Zlotnick, Aviad
    Hashoul, Sharbell
    2016 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2016, : 722 - 725
  • [49] A comparative study of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging: Results from a high-risk population
    Kontos, Despina
    Xing, Ye
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: COMPUTER - AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2010, 7624
  • [50] Breast Cancer Detection: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Mammography versus Digital Mammography
    Ha, Su Min
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)