The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography

被引:20
|
作者
Mainprize, James G. [1 ]
Tyson, Albert H. [1 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
digital mammography; anatomic noise; breast density; image analysis; CANCER RISK; THICKNESS; IMAGES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4736422
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The appearance of parenchymal/stromal patterns in mammography have been characterized as having a Wiener power spectrum with an inverse power-law shape described by the exponential parameter, beta. The amount of fibroglandular tissue, which can be quantified in terms of volumetric breast density (VBD), influences the texture and appearance of the patterns formed in a mammogram. Here, a large study is performed to investigate the variations in beta in a clinical population and to indicate the relationship between beta and breast density. Methods: From a set of 2686 cranio-caudal normal screening mammograms, the parameter beta was extracted from log-log fits to the Wiener spectrum over the range 0.15-1 min(-1). The Wiener spectrum was calculated from regions of interest in the compression paddle contact region of the breast. An in-house computer program, Cumulus V, was used to extract the volumetric breast density and identify the compression paddle contact regions of the breast. The Wiener spectra were calculated with and without modulation transfer function (MTF) correction to determine the impact of VBD on the intrinsic anatomic noise. Results: The mean volumetric breast density was 25.5% (+/- 12.6%) over all images. The mean beta following a MTF correction which decreased the beta slightly (approximate to-0.08) was found to be 2.87. Varying the maximum of the spatial frequency range of the fits from 0.7 to 1.0, 1.25 or 1.5 mm(-1) showing small decreases in the result, although the effect of the quantum noise power component on reducing beta was clearly observed at 1.5 mm(-1). Conclusions: The texture parameter, beta, was found to increase with VBD at low volumetric breast densities with an apparent leveling off at higher densities. The relationship between beta and VBD measured here can be used to create probabilistic models for computer simulations of detectability. As breast density is a known risk predictor for breast cancer, the correlation between beta and VBD suggests that beta may provide predictive information and this will be investigated in the future. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4736422]
引用
收藏
页码:4660 / 4668
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT
    Geeraert, N.
    Klausz, R.
    Cockmartin, L.
    Muller, S.
    Bosmans, H.
    Bloch, I.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (15): : 4391 - 4409
  • [22] Quantitative volumetric breast density estimation using phase contrast mammography
    Wang, Zhentian
    Hauser, Nik
    Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
    D'Isidoro, Fabio
    Stampanoni, Marco
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (10): : 4123 - 4135
  • [23] Optimization of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammograms
    Holland, Katharina
    Gubern-Merida, Albert
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (09): : 3779 - 3797
  • [24] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER
    Jari, Irina
    Naum, A. G.
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Negru, D.
    Ursaru, Manuela
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2019, 123 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [25] A Comparative Study of Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Results from a Screening Population
    Kontos, Despina
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Acciavatti, Raymond J.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2010, 6136 : 378 - 385
  • [26] Development and validation of the surmising model for volumetric breast density using X-ray exposure conditions in digital mammography
    Yamamuro, Mika
    Asai, Yoshiyuki
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Kimura, Yuichi
    Ishii, Kazunari
    Kondo, Yohan
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2025, 63 (01) : 169 - 179
  • [27] Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography
    Cubuk, R.
    Tasali, N.
    Narin, B.
    Keskiner, F.
    Celik, L.
    Guney, S.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2010, 115 (03): : 434 - 441
  • [28] PB.25: Relationship between volumetric breast density, age and hormonal factors
    PF Johnson
    JC Sergeant
    M Bydder
    A Maxwell
    S Whiteside
    P Stavrinos
    M Wilson
    DG Evans
    A Howell
    SM Astley
    Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [29] Automated Breast Density Assessment for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Jiang, Shu
    Bennett, Debbie L.
    Chen, Simin
    Toriola, Adetunji T.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2025, 18 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [30] Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
    Stefanie Weigel
    W. Heindel
    J. Heidrich
    H.-W. Hense
    O. Heidinger
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 2744 - 2751