Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density

被引:73
|
作者
Weigel, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Heindel, W. [1 ,2 ]
Heidrich, J. [3 ]
Hense, H. -W. [3 ,4 ]
Heidinger, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1,Bldg A1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Reference Ctr Mammog, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1,Bldg A1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[3] Canc Registry North Rhine Westphalia, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Munster, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, Munster, Germany
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Digital mammography; Breast density; Interval cancer; Population surveillance; INTERVAL CANCERS; RISK; WOMEN; ULTRASOUND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To analyse the impact of breast density on the sensitivity of a population-based digital mammography screening programme (SP) as key evaluation parameter. 25,576 examinations were prospectively stratified from ACR category 1 to 4 for increments of 25 % density during independent double reading. SP was calculated as number of screen-detected cancers divided by the sum of screen-detected plus interval cancers (24-months period) per ACR category, related to the first reading (a), second reading (b) and highest stratification if discrepant (c). Chi-square tests were used for comparison. Overall sensitivity of the programme was 79.9 %. SP in ACR 4 (a: 50 %, b: 50 %, c: 50 %) was significantly lower than in ACR 3 (a: 72.9 %, b: 79.4 %, c: 80.7 %, p < 0.001), ACR 2 (a: 83.9 %, b: 85.7 %, c: 83.2 %, p < 0.001) and ACR 1 (a: 100 %, b: 88.8 %, c: 100 %; p < 0.001). Frequencies of ACR 4 were a: 5.0 %, b: 4.3 %, c: 6.9 %. Digital mammography screening with independent double reading leads to a high overall SP. In the small group of women with breast density classified as ACR 4 SP is significantly reduced compared to all other ACR categories. aEuro cent Overall sensitivity of a population-based digital mammography screening programme (SP) was 79.9 %. aEuro cent In women with ACR 1, 2, or 3, SP ranged between 72.9 %-100 %. aEuro cent ACR 4 was rare in participants (< 7 %) and SP was only 50 %. aEuro cent SP in ACR 4 differed significantly from ACR 3 (p < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:2744 / 2751
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
    Stefanie Weigel
    W. Heindel
    J. Heidrich
    H.-W. Hense
    O. Heidinger
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 2744 - 2751
  • [2] Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort
    Payne, Nicholas R.
    Hickman, Sarah E.
    Black, Richard
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Hudson, Sue
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 177 - 187
  • [3] The influence of breast density on the sensitivity of mammography screening
    Verbeek, A. L. M.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2004, 2 (03): : 57 - 57
  • [4] Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Holland, Katharina
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 162 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [5] Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
    Johanna O. P. Wanders
    Katharina Holland
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    Ritse M. Mann
    Ruud M. Pijnappel
    Petra H. M. Peeters
    Carla H. van Gils
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 162 : 95 - 103
  • [6] Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme
    McCullagh, J. B.
    Baldelli, P.
    Phelan, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 (1007): : 1027 - 1033
  • [7] Breast density in screening mammography
    Tse, Tim
    Wu, Bosco
    Willcock, Simon
    Vagholkar, Sanjyot
    Sedaghat, Negin
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2024, 53 (11) : 879 - 880
  • [8] Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: A cohort study from a population based screening programme in Denmark
    von Euler-Chelpin, My
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [9] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326
  • [10] Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme
    Keavey, E.
    Phelan, N.
    O'Connell, A. M.
    Flanagan, F.
    O'Doherty, A.
    Larke, A.
    Connors, A. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1016): : 1123 - 1127