Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density

被引:73
|
作者
Weigel, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Heindel, W. [1 ,2 ]
Heidrich, J. [3 ]
Hense, H. -W. [3 ,4 ]
Heidinger, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1,Bldg A1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Reference Ctr Mammog, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1,Bldg A1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[3] Canc Registry North Rhine Westphalia, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Munster, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, Munster, Germany
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Digital mammography; Breast density; Interval cancer; Population surveillance; INTERVAL CANCERS; RISK; WOMEN; ULTRASOUND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To analyse the impact of breast density on the sensitivity of a population-based digital mammography screening programme (SP) as key evaluation parameter. 25,576 examinations were prospectively stratified from ACR category 1 to 4 for increments of 25 % density during independent double reading. SP was calculated as number of screen-detected cancers divided by the sum of screen-detected plus interval cancers (24-months period) per ACR category, related to the first reading (a), second reading (b) and highest stratification if discrepant (c). Chi-square tests were used for comparison. Overall sensitivity of the programme was 79.9 %. SP in ACR 4 (a: 50 %, b: 50 %, c: 50 %) was significantly lower than in ACR 3 (a: 72.9 %, b: 79.4 %, c: 80.7 %, p < 0.001), ACR 2 (a: 83.9 %, b: 85.7 %, c: 83.2 %, p < 0.001) and ACR 1 (a: 100 %, b: 88.8 %, c: 100 %; p < 0.001). Frequencies of ACR 4 were a: 5.0 %, b: 4.3 %, c: 6.9 %. Digital mammography screening with independent double reading leads to a high overall SP. In the small group of women with breast density classified as ACR 4 SP is significantly reduced compared to all other ACR categories. aEuro cent Overall sensitivity of a population-based digital mammography screening programme (SP) was 79.9 %. aEuro cent In women with ACR 1, 2, or 3, SP ranged between 72.9 %-100 %. aEuro cent ACR 4 was rare in participants (< 7 %) and SP was only 50 %. aEuro cent SP in ACR 4 differed significantly from ACR 3 (p < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:2744 / 2751
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Olinder, Jakob
    Johnson, Kristin
    Akesson, Anna
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [32] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Jakob Olinder
    Kristin Johnson
    Anna Åkesson
    Daniel Förnvik
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Breast Cancer Research, 25
  • [33] Breast symptoms and risk of interval breast cancers in mammography-screening programme
    Singh, D.
    Miettinen, J.
    Duffy, S.
    Malila, N.
    Pitkaniemi, J.
    Anttila, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S11 - S11
  • [34] DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER: AN OVERVIEW
    Van Ongeval, Ch.
    JBR-BTR, 2007, 90 (03): : 163 - 166
  • [35] Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography
    Warren, Lucy M.
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1067):
  • [36] Breast tomosynthesis: A diagnostic addition to screening digital mammography
    El Bakry, Rehab Abdel Rahman
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 49 (02): : 529 - 535
  • [37] Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening
    Kosus, Nermin
    Kosus, Aydin
    Duran, Muzeyyen
    Simavli, Serap
    Turhan, Nilgun
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (03) : 152 - 157
  • [38] Reproducibility of the breast density classification in digital mammography: results from preliminary phases of the Tailored Breast Screening Trial
    不详
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2013, 37 (4-5): : 325 - 327
  • [39] Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward?
    Bluekens, Adriana M. J.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (05) : 505 - 507
  • [40] Initial Experience With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening Mammography
    Philpotts, L.
    Raghu, M.
    Durand, M.
    Hooley, R.
    Vashi, R.
    Horvath, L.
    Geisel, J.
    Butler, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)