Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density

被引:73
|
作者
Weigel, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Heindel, W. [1 ,2 ]
Heidrich, J. [3 ]
Hense, H. -W. [3 ,4 ]
Heidinger, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1,Bldg A1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Reference Ctr Mammog, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1,Bldg A1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[3] Canc Registry North Rhine Westphalia, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Munster, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, Munster, Germany
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Digital mammography; Breast density; Interval cancer; Population surveillance; INTERVAL CANCERS; RISK; WOMEN; ULTRASOUND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To analyse the impact of breast density on the sensitivity of a population-based digital mammography screening programme (SP) as key evaluation parameter. 25,576 examinations were prospectively stratified from ACR category 1 to 4 for increments of 25 % density during independent double reading. SP was calculated as number of screen-detected cancers divided by the sum of screen-detected plus interval cancers (24-months period) per ACR category, related to the first reading (a), second reading (b) and highest stratification if discrepant (c). Chi-square tests were used for comparison. Overall sensitivity of the programme was 79.9 %. SP in ACR 4 (a: 50 %, b: 50 %, c: 50 %) was significantly lower than in ACR 3 (a: 72.9 %, b: 79.4 %, c: 80.7 %, p < 0.001), ACR 2 (a: 83.9 %, b: 85.7 %, c: 83.2 %, p < 0.001) and ACR 1 (a: 100 %, b: 88.8 %, c: 100 %; p < 0.001). Frequencies of ACR 4 were a: 5.0 %, b: 4.3 %, c: 6.9 %. Digital mammography screening with independent double reading leads to a high overall SP. In the small group of women with breast density classified as ACR 4 SP is significantly reduced compared to all other ACR categories. aEuro cent Overall sensitivity of a population-based digital mammography screening programme (SP) was 79.9 %. aEuro cent In women with ACR 1, 2, or 3, SP ranged between 72.9 %-100 %. aEuro cent ACR 4 was rare in participants (< 7 %) and SP was only 50 %. aEuro cent SP in ACR 4 differed significantly from ACR 3 (p < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:2744 / 2751
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of age and breast density on the sensitivity of mammography
    AM Kavanagh
    GB Byrnes
    J Hopper
    GG Giles
    DM Gertig
    JN Cawson
    G Marr
    Breast Cancer Research, 6 (Suppl 1)
  • [22] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies
    Funaro, Kimberly
    Drukteinis, Jennifer
    Falcon, Shannon
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (10) : 607 - 613
  • [23] Digital mammography: Are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees, Alexis V.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (04) : 401 - 407
  • [24] Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening
    Haas, Brian M.
    Kalra, Vivek
    Geisel, Jaime
    Raghu, Madhavi
    Durand, Melissa
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (03) : 694 - 700
  • [25] A Pilot Study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme
    P. Looney
    M. D. Halling-Brown
    J. M. Oduko
    K. C. Young
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2015, 28 : 586 - 593
  • [26] A Pilot Study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme
    Looney, P.
    Halling-Brown, M. D.
    Oduko, J. M.
    Young, K. C.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2015, 28 (05) : 586 - 593
  • [27] Breast Cancer Screening via Digital Mammography, Synthetic Mammography, and Tomosynthesis
    Cohen, Ethan O.
    Weaver, Olena O.
    Tso, Hilda H.
    Gerlach, Karen E.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (03) : 470 - 472
  • [28] Review of dosimetric methods for mammography in the UK Breast Screening Programme
    Young, KC
    Ramsdale, ML
    Bignell, F
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1998, 80 (1-3) : 183 - 186
  • [29] Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Improves Performance of Mammography Screening
    Bae, Min Sun
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (03)
  • [30] Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy L.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Osteras, Bjorn H.
    Gullien, Randi
    Gur, David
    Hofvind, Solveig
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) : 22 - 29