Performance evaluation of disposable inhalable aerosol sampler at a copper electrorefinery

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, Eun Gyung [1 ]
Grimson, Peter J. [2 ]
Chisholm, William P. [1 ]
Kashon, Michael L. [3 ]
He, Xinjian [2 ]
L'Orange, Christian [4 ]
Volckens, John [4 ]
机构
[1] NIOSH, Hlth Effects Lab Div, Exposure Assessment Branch, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] NIOSH, Hlth Effects Lab Div, Biostat & Epidemiol Branch, Morgantown, WV USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Copper electrorefinery; disposable inhalable aerosol sampler; exposure assessment; IOM sampler; sampling pairs; transportation loss; CONCORDANCE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; CASSETTE; AIR; AGREEMENT; CAPSULES; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1080/15459624.2019.1568444
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the performance of the disposable inhalable aerosol sampler (DIAS), a new sampler developed to be more cost-effective than the traditional inhalable particle samplers and comparable to the inhalable particle sampling convention. Forty-eight pairs of the DIAS prototype and the IOM sampler were utilized to collect copper exposure measurements (23 personal and 25 area) at an electrorefinery facility. The geometric mean (GM) value of ratios of exposure data (DIAS/IOM) was 1.1, while the GM of ratios (DIAS/IOM) was 1.6 for the area exposure data, revealing 84% of the ratios were greater than one. For both personal and area exposure data, the concordance correlation coefficient tests revealed significant disagreements between the two types of samplers and suggested precision as the source of the disagreement. The estimated mean concentration was higher for the DIAS compared that for the IOM for the area exposure data (p < 0.05), while the results were comparable for the personal exposure data (p = 0.49). Overall, the DIAS generated higher exposure results compared to the IOM sampler for the area exposures. For the personal exposures, the findings were inconclusive due to inconsistent results of factors aforementioned. This study is limited to one metal component (copper) of the dust at a worksite. To date, this is the first field evaluation using personal exposure data to test the performance of the DIAS and the second evaluation using area exposure data. Thus, it will be necessary to conduct additional field evaluations with various elements to further evaluate the performance of the DIAS. In addition, particle migration to the internal walls of the cap was observed during the transportation of collected samples to a laboratory for both sampler types (6.4% for the DIAS and 7.4% for the IOM). Occupational health and safety professionals should be aware of potential errors caused from transferring samples from a field to a laboratory and should be careful not to exclude particles collected on the caps.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 257
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol
    L'Orange, Christian
    Anderson, Kimberly
    Sleeth, Darrah
    Anthony, T. Renee
    Volckens, John
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2016, 60 (02): : 150 - 160
  • [2] Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention
    Ben Borsh, F.
    Sleeth, Darrah K.
    Handy, Rod G.
    Pahler, Leon F.
    Andrews, Ronnee
    Ashley, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2019, 16 (09) : 634 - 642
  • [3] Assessment of increased sampling pump flow rates in a disposable, inhalable aerosol sampler
    Stewart, Justin
    Sleeth, Darrah K.
    Handy, Rod G.
    Pahler, Leon F.
    Anthony, T. Renee
    Volckens, John
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2017, 14 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [4] Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler
    Aizenberg, V
    Grinshpun, SA
    Willeke, K
    Smith, J
    Baron, PA
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 61 (03): : 398 - 404
  • [5] Improvements to the design and performance of an ambient inhalable aerosol sampler
    Upton, S.L.
    Mark, D.
    Hall, D.J.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1992, 23 (SUPPL 1)
  • [6] A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance
    Kenny, LC
    Aitken, R
    Chalmers, C
    Fabries, JF
    GonzalezFernandez, E
    Kromhout, H
    Liden, G
    Mark, D
    Riediger, G
    Prodi, V
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1997, 41 (02): : 135 - 153
  • [7] Lung Deposition Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol
    Clark, Philip
    Koehler, Kirsten
    Volckens, John
    INHALED PARTICLES X, 2009, 151
  • [8] Inhalable aerosol selector for the CIP 10 personal aerosol sampler
    Gorner, P.
    Wrobel, R.
    Roger, F.
    Fabries, J.-F.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1999, 30 (Suppl. 1)
  • [9] Evaluation of the use of an SKC button inhalable aerosol sampler with a Grimm aerosol monitor to determine air concentrations of subtilisin
    Cross, Jason B.
    Larson, Rodney R.
    Pahler, Leon F.
    Sleeth, Darrah K.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2014, 21 (06): : 4 - 13
  • [10] Comparison of a simplified and full-size mannequin for the evaluation of inhalable sampler performance
    Kennedy, NJ
    Tatyan, K
    Hinds, WC
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (01) : 564 - 568