Single- Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Hysterotomy Incision During Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Uterine Rupture EDITORIAL COMMENT

被引:4
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ]
Chaillet, Nils
Boutin, Amelie
Moore, Lynne
Jastrow, Nicole
Brassard, Normand
Gauthier, Robert J.
Hudic, Igor
Shipp, Thomas D.
Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
Fatusic, Zlatan
Demers, Suzanne
Bujold, Emmanuel
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182439e50
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Techniques used for closure of the hysterotomy site following cesarean delivery include the use of interrupted, locked, and unlocked continuous sutures with single-or double-layer closure. The specific technique used may be associated with risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor (TOL) in future pregnancies. In a recent systematic review, single-layer closure but not double-layer closure was shown to reduce operating time and blood loss. However, a large randomized controlled trial published in 2010 found no such benefit for single-layer closure. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effect of single-versus double-layer closure on risk of uterine rupture. A search of the electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-was conducted to identify relevant citations published up to 2010 that included data on women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who underwent TOL. Both observational and experimental studies were included in the search. To assess the risk of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence, random effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Data from 9 studies including 5810 women met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significantly higher overall risk of uterine rupture during TOL after use of a single-layer closure compared with a double-layer closure; the OR was 1.71, with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.66-4.44 (P = 0.27). Compared with a double-layer closure, the use of a locked single-layer closure (OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.58-9.52, P < 0.001) but not an unlocked single-layer closure (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16, P = 0.1) was associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. These findings show that the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting a TOL is significantly higher with use of a locked single-layer closure than either an unlocked single-layer closure or a double-layer closure.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 15
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors for uterine incision extension during cesarean delivery
    Karavani, Gilad
    Chill, Henry H.
    Reuveni-Salzman, Adi
    Guedalia, Joshua
    Ben Menahem-Zidon, Ofra
    Cohen, Nir
    Elchalal, Uriel
    Shveiky, David
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (11): : 2156 - 2161
  • [42] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rozenberg, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05)
  • [43] Cesarean Delivery at Extreme Prematurity: Risk of Uterine Rupture Independent of Incision Type
    Lannon, Sophia R.
    Guthrie, Katherine A.
    Vanderhoeven, Jeroen P.
    Gammill, Hilary S.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 104A - 104A
  • [44] Unintended lower-segment hysterotomy extension at cesarean delivery and the risk for uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor
    Peled, Tzuria
    Ashwal, Eran
    Rotem, Reut
    Sela, Hen Y.
    Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
    Rottenstreich, Misgav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 162 (03) : 957 - 963
  • [46] Purse-string double-layer closure for cesarean incision (Turan technique): Some concerns
    Matsubara, Shigeki
    Lefor, Alan K.
    Ohkuchi, Akihide
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (05) : 828 - 829
  • [47] Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Demers, Suzanne
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05) : 453 - 460
  • [49] Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
    Stegwee, S., I
    van der Voet, L. F.
    Ben, A. J.
    de Leeuw, R. A.
    van de Ven, P. M.
    Duijnhoven, R. G.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    de Groot, C. J. M.
    Huirne, J. A. F.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (05) : 866 - 878
  • [50] Continuous vs interrupted sutures for single-layer closure of uterine incision at cesarean section
    M. Hohlagschwandtner
    K. Chalubinski
    A. Nather
    P. Husslein
    E. Joura
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2003, 268 (1) : 26 - 28