Single- Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Hysterotomy Incision During Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Uterine Rupture EDITORIAL COMMENT

被引:4
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ]
Chaillet, Nils
Boutin, Amelie
Moore, Lynne
Jastrow, Nicole
Brassard, Normand
Gauthier, Robert J.
Hudic, Igor
Shipp, Thomas D.
Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
Fatusic, Zlatan
Demers, Suzanne
Bujold, Emmanuel
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182439e50
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Techniques used for closure of the hysterotomy site following cesarean delivery include the use of interrupted, locked, and unlocked continuous sutures with single-or double-layer closure. The specific technique used may be associated with risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor (TOL) in future pregnancies. In a recent systematic review, single-layer closure but not double-layer closure was shown to reduce operating time and blood loss. However, a large randomized controlled trial published in 2010 found no such benefit for single-layer closure. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effect of single-versus double-layer closure on risk of uterine rupture. A search of the electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-was conducted to identify relevant citations published up to 2010 that included data on women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who underwent TOL. Both observational and experimental studies were included in the search. To assess the risk of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence, random effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Data from 9 studies including 5810 women met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significantly higher overall risk of uterine rupture during TOL after use of a single-layer closure compared with a double-layer closure; the OR was 1.71, with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.66-4.44 (P = 0.27). Compared with a double-layer closure, the use of a locked single-layer closure (OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.58-9.52, P < 0.001) but not an unlocked single-layer closure (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16, P = 0.1) was associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. These findings show that the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting a TOL is significantly higher with use of a locked single-layer closure than either an unlocked single-layer closure or a double-layer closure.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 15
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure Reply
    Saccone, C.
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 666 - +
  • [22] Single versus double layer closure of low transverse uterine incision at cesarean section
    Kumar, Sood Atul
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (03): : 231 - 236
  • [23] Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study
    Tekiner, Nur Betul
    Cetin, Berna Aslan
    Turkgeldi, Lale Susan
    Yilmaz, Gokce
    Polat, Ibrahim
    Gedikbasi, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 297 (05) : 1137 - 1143
  • [24] Single-Versus Double-Layer Hysterotomy Closure at Primary Caesarean Delivery and Bladder Adhesions
    Blumenfeld, Y. J.
    Caughey, A. B.
    El-Sayed, Y. Y.
    Daniels, K.
    Lyella, D. J.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2010, 65 (08) : 482 - 484
  • [25] Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study
    Nur Betül Tekiner
    Berna Aslan Çetin
    Lale Susan Türkgeldi
    Gökçe Yılmaz
    İbrahim Polat
    Ali Gedikbaşı
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 297 : 1137 - 1143
  • [26] Beyond single- vs double-layer closure: optimizing uterine repair in cesarean delivery with endometrium-free technique
    Antoine, Clarel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 232 (03) : e198 - e198
  • [27] Authors' Response to the Letter to the Editor: Single-vs. Double-Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
    Bamberg, Christian
    Hinkson, Larry
    Henrich, Wolfgang
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2017, 38 (04): : 449 - 449
  • [28] The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Bujold, E
    Bujold, C
    Hamilton, EF
    Harel, F
    Gauthier, RJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1326 - 1330
  • [29] Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy
    Vachon-Marceau, Chantale
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Pasquier, Jean-Charles
    Girard, Mario
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boulvain, Michel
    Jastrow, Nicole
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 65.e1 - 65.e5
  • [30] Purse-string double-layer closure: A novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section
    Turan, Cem
    Buyukbayrak, Esra Esim
    Yilmaz, Aylin Onan
    Karsidag, Yasemin Karageyim
    Pirimoglu, Meltem
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (04) : 565 - 574