Single- Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Hysterotomy Incision During Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Uterine Rupture EDITORIAL COMMENT

被引:4
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ]
Chaillet, Nils
Boutin, Amelie
Moore, Lynne
Jastrow, Nicole
Brassard, Normand
Gauthier, Robert J.
Hudic, Igor
Shipp, Thomas D.
Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
Fatusic, Zlatan
Demers, Suzanne
Bujold, Emmanuel
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182439e50
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Techniques used for closure of the hysterotomy site following cesarean delivery include the use of interrupted, locked, and unlocked continuous sutures with single-or double-layer closure. The specific technique used may be associated with risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor (TOL) in future pregnancies. In a recent systematic review, single-layer closure but not double-layer closure was shown to reduce operating time and blood loss. However, a large randomized controlled trial published in 2010 found no such benefit for single-layer closure. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effect of single-versus double-layer closure on risk of uterine rupture. A search of the electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-was conducted to identify relevant citations published up to 2010 that included data on women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who underwent TOL. Both observational and experimental studies were included in the search. To assess the risk of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence, random effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Data from 9 studies including 5810 women met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significantly higher overall risk of uterine rupture during TOL after use of a single-layer closure compared with a double-layer closure; the OR was 1.71, with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.66-4.44 (P = 0.27). Compared with a double-layer closure, the use of a locked single-layer closure (OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.58-9.52, P < 0.001) but not an unlocked single-layer closure (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16, P = 0.1) was associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. These findings show that the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting a TOL is significantly higher with use of a locked single-layer closure than either an unlocked single-layer closure or a double-layer closure.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 15
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single versus double layer closure and the risk of uterine rupture: A multicentre VBAC study
    Goyet, M
    Bujold, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S20 - S20
  • [32] Inadvertent hysterotomy extension at cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture in the next pregnancy
    Goldfarb, Ilona
    Henry, Dana
    Dumont, Olivia
    Barth, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S266 - S266
  • [33] 62Single-Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kar, I.
    Qayum, K.
    BJS-BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [34] Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure at the Time of Cesarean and Subsequent Risks in Those With Placenta Accreta Spectrum
    Phelps, Alexandra
    Harrison, Rachel
    Holmgren, Calla
    Hussein, Nada
    Steinberg, Guy
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 57S - 57S
  • [35] A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness
    Bamberg, Christian
    Dudenhausen, Joachim W.
    Bujak, Verena
    Rodekamp, Elke
    Brauer, Martin
    Hinkson, Larry
    Kalache, Karim
    Henrich, Wolfgang
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2018, 39 (03): : 343 - 351
  • [36] Long-term follow-up of purse-string double-layer closure (Turan technique) for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean delivery
    Turan, Cem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [37] Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Saccone, G.
    Mccurdy, R.
    Bujold, E.
    Bifulco, G.
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 578 - 583
  • [38] Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study
    Glavind, J.
    Madsen, L. D.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    Dueholm, M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [39] Single versus double layer closure and risk of uterine rupture : systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S247 - S247
  • [40] Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: Risk of Uterine Rupture With Labor Induction EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Ouzounian, Joseph G.
    Miller, David A.
    Hiebert, Christy J.
    Battista, Leah R.
    Lee, Richard H.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2011, 66 (12) : 737 - 738