Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the "sisal belt" of Kilosa, central Tanzania

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Puyang [1 ]
Hu, Guohua [2 ]
Turner II, B. L. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yujia [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Landscape Ecol & Sustainabil Lab LESL, 800 Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] East China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, 500 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, 975 S Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, 777 E Univ Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Geospatial Sci, 900 Univ Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Estate-smallholder nexuses; Carbon sequestration; Water yield; Landscape sustainability; Stakeholder-defined scenarios; LAND-USE; GLOBAL LAND; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SCALE; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; INVESTMENTS; PRIORITIES; SCENARIOS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-022-01584-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Exploring ways to maintain a biophysically functioning environment while improving human welfare based on competing stakeholder land uses is critical for sustainable development, especially under the context of a surging "global land rush ".Objectives This research (1) integrates different stakeholders' perceptions of human-environmental conditions and dynamics in the "sisal belt " of Kilosa, Tanzania, in terms of three alternative development visions or scenarios of land uses and covers, and (2) demonstrates the trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem and economic outcomes at a landscape level.Methods Two spatially explicit modeling tools, Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST), are combined to assess future land-use and -cover patterns and project changes in four ecosystem services, including provisioning commodity production, under the three stakeholder-defined scenarios for the study area up to 2030.Results Each scenario had higher commodity production values relative to the baseline conditions of 2018 but lower levels of ecosystem services addressed at the level of the Kilosa sisal belt landscape. Carbon and water services may generate synergistic effects provided specific mitigation and payment mechanisms are installed. The spatial distribution of the changes in these services is projected.Conclusions Our approach provides an empirical-based platform to inform landscape management and planning. It provides a co-designed means to address possible futures of human-environmental conditions affecting sustainability, in this case for food production, resource use, poverty alleviation, and environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 551
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Montes, Carlos
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 : 220 - 228
  • [42] Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape
    Turner, Katrine Grace
    Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
    Bocher, Peder K.
    Dalgaard, Tommy
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 125 : 89 - 104
  • [43] Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops
    Bruno Rapidel
    Aude Ripoche
    Clémentine Allinne
    Aurélie Metay
    Olivier Deheuvels
    Nathalie Lamanda
    Jean-Marc Blazy
    Héctor Valdés-Gómez
    Christian Gary
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35 : 1373 - 1390
  • [44] Spatiotemporal Changes and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Waterfront Ecosystem Services Globally
    Zheng, Yaomin
    Yang, Huize
    Gong, Huixin
    Shi, Jinlian
    Zhang, Yanhui
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Zhang, Xin
    Cheng, Ruifen
    Chen, Yu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [45] Trade-offs between fire prevention and provision of ecosystem services in Slovenia
    Mavsar, Robert
    Japelj, Anze
    Kovac, Marko
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 29 : 62 - 69
  • [46] Ecosystem services of the Southern Ocean: trade-offs in decision-making
    Grant, Susie M.
    Hill, Simeon L.
    Trathan, Philip N.
    Murphy, Eugene J.
    ANTARCTIC SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (05) : 603 - 617
  • [47] Urban and agricultural soils: conflicts and trade-offs in the optimization of ecosystem services
    Setala, H.
    Bardgett, R. D.
    Birkhofer, K.
    Brady, M.
    Byrne, L.
    de Ruiter, P. C.
    de Vries, F. T.
    Gardi, C.
    Hedlund, K.
    Hemerik, L.
    Hotes, S.
    Liiri, M.
    Mortimer, S. R.
    Pavao-Zuckerman, M.
    Pouyat, R.
    Tsiafouli, M.
    van der Putten, W. H.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (01) : 239 - 253
  • [48] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    QIAO Xuning
    GU Yangyang
    ZOU Changxin
    WANG Lei
    LUO Juhua
    HUANG Xianfeng
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 (01) : 86 - 99
  • [49] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Xuning Qiao
    Yangyang Gu
    Changxin Zou
    Lei Wang
    Juhua Luo
    Xianfeng Huang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 : 86 - 99
  • [50] Effects of agricultural land consolidation on ecosystem services: Trade-offs and synergies
    Zhong, Lina
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Xiao
    Ying, Lingxiao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264