Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the "sisal belt" of Kilosa, central Tanzania

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Puyang [1 ]
Hu, Guohua [2 ]
Turner II, B. L. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yujia [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Landscape Ecol & Sustainabil Lab LESL, 800 Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] East China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, 500 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, 975 S Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, 777 E Univ Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Geospatial Sci, 900 Univ Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Estate-smallholder nexuses; Carbon sequestration; Water yield; Landscape sustainability; Stakeholder-defined scenarios; LAND-USE; GLOBAL LAND; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SCALE; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; INVESTMENTS; PRIORITIES; SCENARIOS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-022-01584-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Exploring ways to maintain a biophysically functioning environment while improving human welfare based on competing stakeholder land uses is critical for sustainable development, especially under the context of a surging "global land rush ".Objectives This research (1) integrates different stakeholders' perceptions of human-environmental conditions and dynamics in the "sisal belt " of Kilosa, Tanzania, in terms of three alternative development visions or scenarios of land uses and covers, and (2) demonstrates the trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem and economic outcomes at a landscape level.Methods Two spatially explicit modeling tools, Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST), are combined to assess future land-use and -cover patterns and project changes in four ecosystem services, including provisioning commodity production, under the three stakeholder-defined scenarios for the study area up to 2030.Results Each scenario had higher commodity production values relative to the baseline conditions of 2018 but lower levels of ecosystem services addressed at the level of the Kilosa sisal belt landscape. Carbon and water services may generate synergistic effects provided specific mitigation and payment mechanisms are installed. The spatial distribution of the changes in these services is projected.Conclusions Our approach provides an empirical-based platform to inform landscape management and planning. It provides a co-designed means to address possible futures of human-environmental conditions affecting sustainability, in this case for food production, resource use, poverty alleviation, and environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 551
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Imbach, Pablo
    Wunder, Sven
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [32] Biodiversity mitigates trade-offs among species functional traits underpinning multiple ecosystem services
    Walden, Emelie
    Queiroz, Cibele
    Plue, Jan
    Lindborg, Regina
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 26 (06) : 929 - 941
  • [33] Accounting for spatial autocorrelation is needed to avoid misidentifying trade-offs and bundles among ecosystem services
    Shaikh, Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad
    See, Sin Ching
    Richards, Daniel
    Belcher, Richard N.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Torres, Marcelo Galleguillos
    Carrasco, L. Roman
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [34] Unravelling the spatiotemporal trade-offs and synergies among hydrological ecosystem services in a large floodplain lake
    Li, Bing
    Yang, Guishan
    Wan, Rongrong
    Hamilton, David P.
    Wang, Xueran
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 172
  • [35] Trade-offs Among Ecosystem Services After Vegetation Restoration in China's Loess Plateau
    Shi, Peng
    Li, Zhanbin
    Li, Peng
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Binbin
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 2703 - 2713
  • [36] Trade-offs Among Ecosystem Services After Vegetation Restoration in China’s Loess Plateau
    Peng Shi
    Zhanbin Li
    Peng Li
    Yan Zhang
    Binbin Li
    Natural Resources Research, 2021, 30 : 2703 - 2713
  • [37] Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015
    Xu, Xibao
    Yang, Guishan
    Tan, Yan
    Liu, Jingping
    Hu, Huizhi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 634 : 1601 - 1614
  • [38] Anticipating and Managing Future Trade-offs and Complementarities between Ecosystem Services
    Reed, Mark S.
    Hubacek, Klaus
    Bonn, Aletta
    Burt, Tim P.
    Holden, Joseph
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Beharry-Borg, Nesha
    Buckmaster, Sarah
    Chapman, Dan
    Chapman, Pippa J.
    Clay, Gareth D.
    Cornell, Stephen J.
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    Evely, Anna C.
    Fraser, Evan D. G.
    Jin, Nanlin
    Irvine, Brian J.
    Kirkby, Mike J.
    Kunin, William E.
    Prell, Christina
    Quinn, Claire H.
    Slee, Bill
    Stagl, Sigrid
    Termansen, Mette
    Thorp, Simon
    Worrall, Fred
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [39] Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops
    Rapidel, Bruno
    Ripoche, Aude
    Allinne, Clementine
    Metay, Aurelie
    Deheuvels, Olivier
    Lamanda, Nathalie
    Blazy, Jean-Marc
    Valdes-Gomez, Hector
    Gary, Christian
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (04) : 1373 - 1390
  • [40] Assessing Temporal Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services by Production Possibility Frontiers
    Jiang, Wei
    Gao, Guangyao
    Wu, Xing
    Lv, Yihe
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (03)