Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the "sisal belt" of Kilosa, central Tanzania

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Puyang [1 ]
Hu, Guohua [2 ]
Turner II, B. L. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yujia [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Landscape Ecol & Sustainabil Lab LESL, 800 Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] East China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, 500 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, 975 S Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, 777 E Univ Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Geospatial Sci, 900 Univ Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Estate-smallholder nexuses; Carbon sequestration; Water yield; Landscape sustainability; Stakeholder-defined scenarios; LAND-USE; GLOBAL LAND; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SCALE; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; INVESTMENTS; PRIORITIES; SCENARIOS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-022-01584-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Exploring ways to maintain a biophysically functioning environment while improving human welfare based on competing stakeholder land uses is critical for sustainable development, especially under the context of a surging "global land rush ".Objectives This research (1) integrates different stakeholders' perceptions of human-environmental conditions and dynamics in the "sisal belt " of Kilosa, Tanzania, in terms of three alternative development visions or scenarios of land uses and covers, and (2) demonstrates the trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem and economic outcomes at a landscape level.Methods Two spatially explicit modeling tools, Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST), are combined to assess future land-use and -cover patterns and project changes in four ecosystem services, including provisioning commodity production, under the three stakeholder-defined scenarios for the study area up to 2030.Results Each scenario had higher commodity production values relative to the baseline conditions of 2018 but lower levels of ecosystem services addressed at the level of the Kilosa sisal belt landscape. Carbon and water services may generate synergistic effects provided specific mitigation and payment mechanisms are installed. The spatial distribution of the changes in these services is projected.Conclusions Our approach provides an empirical-based platform to inform landscape management and planning. It provides a co-designed means to address possible futures of human-environmental conditions affecting sustainability, in this case for food production, resource use, poverty alleviation, and environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 551
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A farming systems approach to assess synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services
    Silva, J. F.
    Santos, J. L.
    Ribeiro, P. F.
    Marta-Pedroso, C.
    Magalhaes, M. R.
    Moreira, F.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [12] Trade-offs in the provisioning and stability of ecosystem services in agroecosystems
    Montoya, Daniel
    Haegeman, Bart
    Gaba, Sabrina
    De Mazancourt, Claire
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Loreau, Michel
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (02)
  • [13] Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region
    Briner, Simon
    Huber, Robert
    Bebi, Peter
    Elkin, Che
    Schmatz, Dirk R.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [14] Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation Trade-offs and Governance
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    HRVATSKE VODE, 2019, 27 (107) : 77 - 78
  • [15] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR HUMAN WELLBEING Trade-offs and governance
    Mace, Georgina
    Schreckenberg, Kate
    Poudyal, Mahesh
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: TRADE-OFFS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, : 305 - 316
  • [16] Assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services with a multifunctional classification system for grasslands in the Massif Central
    Galliot, J-N
    Hulin, S.
    Bonsacquet, E.
    Carrere, P.
    FOURRAGES, 2019, (237): : 67 - 74
  • [17] Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Celio, Enrico
    Klein, Thomas M.
    Hayek, Ulrike Wissen
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 109 (01) : 107 - 116
  • [18] Trade-offs among ecosystem services in coastal wetlands under the effects of reclamation activities
    Yang, Wei
    Jin, Yuwan
    Sun, Tao
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Yi, Yujun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 92 : 354 - 366
  • [19] Exploring social-ecological impacts on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Peng, Jian
    Luo, Yuhang
    Qiu, Sijing
    Dong, Jianquan
    Zhang, Zimo
    Vercruysse, Kim
    Grabowski, Robert C.
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 197
  • [20] Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale
    Landuyt, Dries
    Broekx, Steven
    Goethals, Peter L. M.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 71 : 327 - 335