Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the "sisal belt" of Kilosa, central Tanzania

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Puyang [1 ]
Hu, Guohua [2 ]
Turner II, B. L. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yujia [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Landscape Ecol & Sustainabil Lab LESL, 800 Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] East China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, 500 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, 975 S Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, 777 E Univ Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Geospatial Sci, 900 Univ Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Estate-smallholder nexuses; Carbon sequestration; Water yield; Landscape sustainability; Stakeholder-defined scenarios; LAND-USE; GLOBAL LAND; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SCALE; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; INVESTMENTS; PRIORITIES; SCENARIOS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-022-01584-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Exploring ways to maintain a biophysically functioning environment while improving human welfare based on competing stakeholder land uses is critical for sustainable development, especially under the context of a surging "global land rush ".Objectives This research (1) integrates different stakeholders' perceptions of human-environmental conditions and dynamics in the "sisal belt " of Kilosa, Tanzania, in terms of three alternative development visions or scenarios of land uses and covers, and (2) demonstrates the trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem and economic outcomes at a landscape level.Methods Two spatially explicit modeling tools, Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST), are combined to assess future land-use and -cover patterns and project changes in four ecosystem services, including provisioning commodity production, under the three stakeholder-defined scenarios for the study area up to 2030.Results Each scenario had higher commodity production values relative to the baseline conditions of 2018 but lower levels of ecosystem services addressed at the level of the Kilosa sisal belt landscape. Carbon and water services may generate synergistic effects provided specific mitigation and payment mechanisms are installed. The spatial distribution of the changes in these services is projected.Conclusions Our approach provides an empirical-based platform to inform landscape management and planning. It provides a co-designed means to address possible futures of human-environmental conditions affecting sustainability, in this case for food production, resource use, poverty alleviation, and environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 551
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Tibet autonomous region
    Huang, Jiuming
    Zheng, Fangyu
    Dong, Xiaobin
    Wang, Xue-Chao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 384
  • [22] Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot
    Lin, Shiwei
    Wu, Ruidong
    Yang, Feiling
    Wang, Junjun
    Wu, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 371 - 381
  • [23] Identifying the impacts of landscape structure on ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem services bundles in the mountains of Southwest China
    Li, Weijie
    Kang, Jinwen
    Wang, Yong
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 209
  • [24] Navigating ecosystem services trade-offs: A global comprehensive review
    Martinez-Harms, Maria Jose
    Larrain-Barrios, Barbara
    Arregoitia, Luis D. Verde
    Palma-Duque, Jose
    Gelcich, Stefan
    AMBIO, 2025,
  • [25] Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services on the Tibetan Plateau
    Yuan, Zhengrong
    Liang, Yuling
    Zhao, Hui
    Wei, Da
    Wang, Xiaodan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158
  • [26] Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000–2015
    W. Chen
    G. Chi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 3221 - 3236
  • [27] Climate change, dermatology and ecosystem services; trends and trade-offs
    Muller, Scott A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 50 (05) : 504 - 507
  • [28] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services
    Wang, Jinnan
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yang, Meng
    Gao, Yueming
    Shao, Jiacheng
    Yang, Weishan
    Ma, Guoxia
    Yu, Fang
    Yao, Nan
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [29] Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robertson, Michael J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 : 147 - 157
  • [30] Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China
    Li, Boyan
    Wang, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 837 - 846