Development of various machine learning and deep learning models to predict glycerol biorefining processes

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Qinyang [1 ]
Li, Minghai [2 ]
Safaei, Mohammad Reza [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Columbia, SC 29201 USA
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Architecture, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Hydrogen production; Machine learning; Glycerol biorefining process; Deep learning; Organic loading rate; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BY-PRODUCT; ELECTROLYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; PLANTS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.207
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biorefining biological waste to produce eco-friendly fuels and by-products is essential in transitioning from non-renewable energies. However, the analysis of the processes in the laboratory necessitates a substantial investment of both time and money. The present study has developed machine learning (ML) models for evaluating biofuel products through glycerol biorefining for the first time. This study evaluates the performance of different ML algorithms, including recurrent neural network (RNN), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), Bayesian ridge (BR), and elastic net linear regression (ENLR). This research by machine learning algorithms can be created the formulas and the models for the hydrogen content (H2) by the hydrogen production and time, the hydrogen production by the H2 and time, OLR by PH and time, OLR by the hydrogen production and time, and the hydrogen production by OLR and time. Using the RNN for predicting the future of H2, hydrogen production, and OLR with the least error. The best R-Squared for the formulas is between 0.951 and 0.994 with the linear and the polynomial forms (by degrees 2, 3, 4). The best R-Squared for the models is between 0.998 and 0.999 with the linear form. MAEs for the formula and the model of H2, respectively, are 2.475347126 and 0.46588143, and MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production, respectively, are 23.44120285 and 7.03283978. MAEs of OLR by PH and OLR by the hydrogen production for formulas and models are 2.095157 and 000001 by PH and 3.148667 and 0.000001 by the hydrogen production. MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production by OLR, respectively, are 19.025255 and 2.718604.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 685
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lifecycle Models in Machine Learning Development
    Crespi, Antonio
    Mesquida, Antoni-Lluis
    Monserrat, Maria
    Mas, Antonia
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2025, 42 (04)
  • [32] The development and deployment of machine learning models
    James A. Pruneski
    Riley J. Williams
    Benedict U. Nwachukwu
    Prem N. Ramkumar
    Ata M. Kiapour
    R. Kyle Martin
    Jón Karlsson
    Ayoosh Pareek
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 3917 - 3923
  • [33] The development and deployment of machine learning models
    Pruneski, James A.
    Williams, Riley J., III
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    Kiapour, Ata M.
    Martin, R. Kyle
    Karlsson, Jon
    Pareek, Ayoosh
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (12) : 3917 - 3923
  • [34] Deep learning models for brain machine interfaces
    Bozhkov, Lachezar
    Georgieva, Petia
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 88 (11-12) : 1175 - 1190
  • [35] Is Deep Learning Better than Machine Learning to Predict Benign Laryngeal Disorders?
    Byeon, Haewon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 12 (04) : 112 - 117
  • [36] Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translation
    Wang, Qiang
    Li, Bei
    Xiao, Tong
    Zhu, Jingbo
    Li, Changliang
    Wong, Derek F.
    Chao, Lidia S.
    57TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL 2019), 2019, : 1810 - 1822
  • [37] Comparison of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms to Diagnose and Predict Breast Cancer
    Ghazalnaz Sharifonnasabi, F.
    Makhdoom, Iman
    Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2024, 839 : 31 - 43
  • [38] Evolving machine learning models to predict hydrogen sulfide solubility in the presence of various ionic liquids
    Amedi, Hamid Reza
    Baghban, Alireza
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2016, 216 : 411 - 422
  • [39] Using Multiple Machine Learning Models to Predict the Strength of UHPC Mixes with Various FA Percentages
    Safieh, Hussam
    Hawileh, Rami A.
    Assad, Maha
    Hajjar, Rawan
    Shaw, Sayan Kumar
    Abdalla, Jamal
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [40] Machine learning models to predict the tunnel wall convergence
    Zhou, Jian
    Chen, Yuxin
    Li, Chuanqi
    Qiu, Yingui
    Huang, Shuai
    Tao, Ming
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2023, 41