Development of various machine learning and deep learning models to predict glycerol biorefining processes

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Qinyang [1 ]
Li, Minghai [2 ]
Safaei, Mohammad Reza [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Columbia, SC 29201 USA
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Architecture, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Hydrogen production; Machine learning; Glycerol biorefining process; Deep learning; Organic loading rate; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BY-PRODUCT; ELECTROLYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; PLANTS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.207
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biorefining biological waste to produce eco-friendly fuels and by-products is essential in transitioning from non-renewable energies. However, the analysis of the processes in the laboratory necessitates a substantial investment of both time and money. The present study has developed machine learning (ML) models for evaluating biofuel products through glycerol biorefining for the first time. This study evaluates the performance of different ML algorithms, including recurrent neural network (RNN), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), Bayesian ridge (BR), and elastic net linear regression (ENLR). This research by machine learning algorithms can be created the formulas and the models for the hydrogen content (H2) by the hydrogen production and time, the hydrogen production by the H2 and time, OLR by PH and time, OLR by the hydrogen production and time, and the hydrogen production by OLR and time. Using the RNN for predicting the future of H2, hydrogen production, and OLR with the least error. The best R-Squared for the formulas is between 0.951 and 0.994 with the linear and the polynomial forms (by degrees 2, 3, 4). The best R-Squared for the models is between 0.998 and 0.999 with the linear form. MAEs for the formula and the model of H2, respectively, are 2.475347126 and 0.46588143, and MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production, respectively, are 23.44120285 and 7.03283978. MAEs of OLR by PH and OLR by the hydrogen production for formulas and models are 2.095157 and 000001 by PH and 3.148667 and 0.000001 by the hydrogen production. MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production by OLR, respectively, are 19.025255 and 2.718604.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 685
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine Learning Models To Predict Length Of Stay In Hospitals
    Jain, Raunak
    Singh, Mrityunjai
    Rao, A. Ravishankar
    Garg, Rahul
    2022 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI 2022), 2022, : 545 - 546
  • [42] Machine Learning Models to Predict Google Stock Prices
    Bucura, Cosmina Elena
    Giudici, Paolo
    ALGORITHMS, 2025, 18 (02)
  • [43] Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage
    Young, Roger C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (01): : 194 - 195
  • [44] Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage
    Venkatesh, Kartik K.
    Strauss, Robert A.
    Grotegut, Chad A.
    Heine, R. Philip
    Chescheir, Nancy C.
    Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Menard, Katherine M.
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (04): : 935 - 944
  • [45] Machine learning models predict selinexor tolerability and efficacy
    Artstein, Y.
    Walker, C.
    Yang, F.
    Van Domelen, D.
    Borochov, D.
    Mercier, I.
    Shah, J.
    Shacham, S.
    Landesman, Y.
    Tang, S.
    Shacham, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S277 - S277
  • [46] Different Machine Learning Models to predict dropouts in MOOCs
    Kashyap, Avinash
    Nayak, Ashalatha
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2018, : 80 - 85
  • [47] Benchmarking machine learning models to predict corporate bankruptcy
    Alanis, Emmanuel
    Chava, Sudheer
    Shah, Agam
    JOURNAL OF CREDIT RISK, 2023, 19 (02): : 77 - 110
  • [48] Hypocalcemia and Machine Learning Models to Predict Trauma Mortality
    Limon, David
    Moreira, Alvaro
    Myers, John C.
    Jenkins, Donald H.
    Braverman, Maxwell
    Barry, Lauran A.
    Lumbard, Derek C.
    Smith, Alison
    Nicholson, Susannah E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S550 - S550
  • [49] Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models Applied to Photovoltaic Production Forecasting
    Cordeiro-Costas, Moises
    Villanueva, Daniel
    Eguia-Oller, Pablo
    Granada-Alvarez, Enrique
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (17):
  • [50] Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models: A Review
    Aljameel, Sumayh S.
    Alzahrani, Manar
    Almusharraf, Reem
    Altukhais, Majd
    Alshaia, Sadeem
    Sahlouli, Hanan
    Aslam, Nida
    Khan, Irfan Ullah
    Alabbad, Dina A.
    Alsumayt, Albandari
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (01)