Development of various machine learning and deep learning models to predict glycerol biorefining processes

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Qinyang [1 ]
Li, Minghai [2 ]
Safaei, Mohammad Reza [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Columbia, SC 29201 USA
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Architecture, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Hydrogen production; Machine learning; Glycerol biorefining process; Deep learning; Organic loading rate; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BY-PRODUCT; ELECTROLYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; PLANTS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.207
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biorefining biological waste to produce eco-friendly fuels and by-products is essential in transitioning from non-renewable energies. However, the analysis of the processes in the laboratory necessitates a substantial investment of both time and money. The present study has developed machine learning (ML) models for evaluating biofuel products through glycerol biorefining for the first time. This study evaluates the performance of different ML algorithms, including recurrent neural network (RNN), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), Bayesian ridge (BR), and elastic net linear regression (ENLR). This research by machine learning algorithms can be created the formulas and the models for the hydrogen content (H2) by the hydrogen production and time, the hydrogen production by the H2 and time, OLR by PH and time, OLR by the hydrogen production and time, and the hydrogen production by OLR and time. Using the RNN for predicting the future of H2, hydrogen production, and OLR with the least error. The best R-Squared for the formulas is between 0.951 and 0.994 with the linear and the polynomial forms (by degrees 2, 3, 4). The best R-Squared for the models is between 0.998 and 0.999 with the linear form. MAEs for the formula and the model of H2, respectively, are 2.475347126 and 0.46588143, and MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production, respectively, are 23.44120285 and 7.03283978. MAEs of OLR by PH and OLR by the hydrogen production for formulas and models are 2.095157 and 000001 by PH and 3.148667 and 0.000001 by the hydrogen production. MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production by OLR, respectively, are 19.025255 and 2.718604.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 685
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using deep learning to predict human decisions and using cognitive models to explain deep learning models
    Fintz, Matan
    Osadchy, Margarita
    Hertz, Uri
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [22] Development and validation of machine learning models to predict postoperative infarction in moyamoya disease
    Fuse, Yutaro
    Ishii, Kazuki
    Kanamori, Fumiaki
    Oyama, Shintaro
    Imaizumi, Takahiro
    Araki, Yoshio
    Yokoyama, Kinya
    Takasu, Syuntaro
    Seki, Yukio
    Saito, Ryuta
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 141 (04) : 927 - 935
  • [23] Development of statistical and machine learning models to predict the occurrence of radiation fog in Japan
    Negishi, Momoko
    Kusaka, Hiroyuki
    METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2022, 29 (02)
  • [24] Development of machine learning models to predict perioperative blood transfusion in hip surgery
    Zang, Han
    Hu, Ai
    Xu, Xuanqi
    Ren, He
    Xu, Li
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [25] Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Readmission After Colorectal Surgery
    Chen, Kevin A.
    Joisa, Chinmaya U.
    Stitzenberg, Karyn B.
    Stem, Jonathan
    Guillem, Jose G.
    Gomez, Shawn M.
    Kapadia, Muneera R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (11) : 2342 - 2350
  • [26] Development of machine learning models to predict inhibition of 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase
    de Avila, Mauricio Boff
    de Azevedo Jr, Walter Filgueira Jr
    CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN, 2018, 92 (02) : 1468 - 1474
  • [27] Using deep learning to predict human decisions and using cognitive models to explain deep learning models
    Matan Fintz
    Margarita Osadchy
    Uri Hertz
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [28] Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Readmission After Colorectal Surgery
    Kevin A. Chen
    Chinmaya U. Joisa
    Karyn B. Stitzenberg
    Jonathan Stem
    Jose G. Guillem
    Shawn M. Gomez
    Muneera R. Kapadia
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2022, 26 : 2342 - 2350
  • [29] Machine and deep learning to predict viral fusion peptides
    Sequeira, A. M.
    Rocha, M.
    Lousa, Diana
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 27 : 692 - 704
  • [30] Deep learning models for brain machine interfaces
    Lachezar Bozhkov
    Petia Georgieva
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 88 : 1175 - 1190