Is Deep Learning Better than Machine Learning to Predict Benign Laryngeal Disorders?

被引:0
|
作者
Byeon, Haewon [1 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Coll AI Convergence, Dept Med Big Data, Gimhae 50834, Gyeonsangnamdo, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Benign laryngeal mucosal disorder; voice disorder; deep learning; Naive Bayes model; generalized linear model; KOREA NATIONAL-HEALTH; VOICE DISORDERS; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; MODEL; POPULATION; DYSPHONIA; ACCURACY; TEACHERS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120415
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
It is important in otolaryngology to accurately understand the etiology of a laryngeal disorder, diagnose it early, and provide appropriate treatment accordingly. The objectives of this study were to develop models for predicting benign laryngeal mucosal disorders based on deep learning, naive Bayes model, generalized linear model, a Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and random forest using laryngeal mucosal disorder data obtained from a national survey and confirm the best classifier for predicting benign laryngeal mucosal disorders by comparing the prediction performance and runtime of the developed models. This study analyzed 626 subjects (313 people with a laryngeal disorder and 313 people without a laryngeal disorder). In this study, deep learning was the best model with the highest accuracy (0.84). However, the runtime of deep learning was 39min 41sec, which was a 10 times longer development time than CART (3min 7sec). This model confirmed that subjective voice problem recognition, pain and discomfort in the last two weeks, education level, occupation, mean monthly household income, high-risk drinker, and current smoker were major variables with high weight for the benign laryngeal mucosal disorders of Korean adults. Among them, subjective voice problem recognition was the most important factor with the highest weight. The results of this study implied that the prediction performance of deep learning could be better than that of machine learning for structured data, such as health behavior and demographic factors as well as video and image data.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHY DEEP LEARNING PERFORMS BETTER THAN CLASSICAL MACHINE LEARNING
    Picon, Artzai
    Alvarez-Gila, Aitor
    Irusta, Unai
    Echazarra, Jone
    DYNA, 2020, 95 (02): : 118 - 122
  • [2] Ensemble of best linear unbiased predictor, machine learning and deep learning models predict maize yield better than each model alone
    Kick, Daniel R.
    Washburn, Jacob D.
    IN SILICO PLANTS, 2023, 5 (02):
  • [3] Is Predicting Software Security Bugs using Deep Learning Better than the Traditional Machine Learning Algorithms?
    Clemente, Caesar Jude
    Jaafar, Fehmi
    Malik, Yasir
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (QRS 2018), 2018, : 95 - 102
  • [4] Can Machine Learning Be Better than Biased Readers?
    Hibi, Atsuhiro
    Zhu, Rui
    Tyrrell, Pascal N.
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (03) : 901 - 908
  • [5] Development of a video-based deep learning model for differentiation of malignant and benign lesions during staging laparoscopy: Is the machine better than the expert?
    Tozzi, Francesca
    Mousavi, Seyed Amir
    Van Liefferinge, Matthias
    Moon, Dongin
    Park, Homin
    Fadaei, Sharareh
    Ceelen, Wim
    Willaert, Wouter
    De Neve, Wesley
    Rashidian, Nikdokht
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [6] Better Prevent than React: Deep Stratified Learning to Predict Hate Intensity of Twitter Reply Chains
    Sahnan, Dhruv
    Dahiya, Snehil
    Goel, Vasu
    Bandhakavi, Anil
    Chakraborty, Tanmoy
    2021 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM 2021), 2021, : 549 - 558
  • [7] Machine and deep learning to predict viral fusion peptides
    Sequeira, A. M.
    Rocha, M.
    Lousa, Diana
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 27 : 692 - 704
  • [8] Comparison of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms to Diagnose and Predict Breast Cancer
    Ghazalnaz Sharifonnasabi, F.
    Makhdoom, Iman
    Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2024, 839 : 31 - 43
  • [9] Machine Learning is better than Human to satisfy Decision by Majority
    Hirokawa, Sachio
    Suzuki, Takahiko
    Mine, Tsunenori
    2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2017), 2017, : 694 - 701
  • [10] Machine learning and deep learning
    Janiesch, Christian
    Zschech, Patrick
    Heinrich, Kai
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2021, 31 (03) : 685 - 695