Development of various machine learning and deep learning models to predict glycerol biorefining processes

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Qinyang [1 ]
Li, Minghai [2 ]
Safaei, Mohammad Reza [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Columbia, SC 29201 USA
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Architecture, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Hydrogen production; Machine learning; Glycerol biorefining process; Deep learning; Organic loading rate; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BY-PRODUCT; ELECTROLYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; PLANTS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.207
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biorefining biological waste to produce eco-friendly fuels and by-products is essential in transitioning from non-renewable energies. However, the analysis of the processes in the laboratory necessitates a substantial investment of both time and money. The present study has developed machine learning (ML) models for evaluating biofuel products through glycerol biorefining for the first time. This study evaluates the performance of different ML algorithms, including recurrent neural network (RNN), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), Bayesian ridge (BR), and elastic net linear regression (ENLR). This research by machine learning algorithms can be created the formulas and the models for the hydrogen content (H2) by the hydrogen production and time, the hydrogen production by the H2 and time, OLR by PH and time, OLR by the hydrogen production and time, and the hydrogen production by OLR and time. Using the RNN for predicting the future of H2, hydrogen production, and OLR with the least error. The best R-Squared for the formulas is between 0.951 and 0.994 with the linear and the polynomial forms (by degrees 2, 3, 4). The best R-Squared for the models is between 0.998 and 0.999 with the linear form. MAEs for the formula and the model of H2, respectively, are 2.475347126 and 0.46588143, and MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production, respectively, are 23.44120285 and 7.03283978. MAEs of OLR by PH and OLR by the hydrogen production for formulas and models are 2.095157 and 000001 by PH and 3.148667 and 0.000001 by the hydrogen production. MAEs for the formula and the model of the hydrogen production by OLR, respectively, are 19.025255 and 2.718604.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 685
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Analysis of various Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Gene Expression
    Thakur, Tanima
    Batra, Isha
    Malik, Arun
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING SCIENCES (ICCS 2021), 2021, : 139 - 142
  • [2] Machine learning models to predict neuropsychiatric disorders in various brain tumors
    Shahid, Saman
    Iftikhar, Sadaf
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2022, 38 (05) : 687 - 696
  • [3] Development and Validation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models to Identify Human Monkeypox
    Nieva, Harry Reyes
    DeLaurentis, Clare
    Elhadad, Noemie
    Gunaratne, Shauna
    McLean, Jacob
    Tucker, Emma
    Zucker, Jason
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2024, 51 (01) : S228 - S229
  • [4] Development and Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Speech Audiometry Prediction
    Shin, Jae sung
    Ma, Jun
    Makara, Mao
    Sung, Nak-Jun
    Choi, Seong Jun
    Kim, Sung yeup
    Hong, Min
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [5] Comparing machine learning and deep learning models to predict cognition progression in Parkinson's disease
    Bernal, Edgar A.
    Yang, Shu
    Herbst, Konnor
    Venuto, Charles S.
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 17 (11):
  • [6] Evaluating water pipe leak detection and localization with various machine learning and deep learning models
    Pandian, C.
    Alphonse, P. J. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [7] Various Frameworks and Libraries of Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Survey
    Zhaobin Wang
    Ke Liu
    Jian Li
    Ying Zhu
    Yaonan Zhang
    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2024, 31 : 1 - 24
  • [8] Various Frameworks and Libraries of Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Survey
    Wang, Zhaobin
    Liu, Ke
    Li, Jian
    Zhu, Ying
    Zhang, Yaonan
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 31 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [9] Development and validation of machine learning models to predict frailty risk for elderly
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Junchao
    Xie, Fang
    Wang, Xinghui
    Dong, Shanshan
    Luo, Nan
    Li, Feng
    Li, Yuewei
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (12) : 5064 - 5075
  • [10] Thermal analysis of PCM magnesium chloride hexahydrate using various machine learning and deep learning models
    Balakrishnan, Vignes Karthic Venkatraman
    Kumaresan, Kannan
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 126