The Evaluation of Snow Depth Simulated by Different Land Surface Models in China Based on Station Observations

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Chunxiang [2 ]
Liang, Xiao [2 ]
Zhang, Shuai [3 ]
Gu, Junxia [2 ]
Han, Shuai [2 ]
Jiang, Hui [2 ]
Xu, Bin [2 ]
Yu, Qingbo [4 ]
Liang, Yujing [2 ]
Deng, Shuai [2 ]
机构
[1] Key Lab Coupling Proc & Effect Nat Resources Eleme, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Meteorol Informat Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Urban Meteorol Beijing, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[4] Meteorol Informat & Network Ctr Jilin Prov, Changchun 130062, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
snow depth; CMA Land Data Assimilation System; CLM3.5; Noah; Noah-MP; assessment; SOIL-MOISTURE; COVER; ASSIMILATION; CLIMATE; RISK; PRECIPITATION; DISASTER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/su151411284
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Snow plays an important role in catastrophic weather, climate change, and water recycling. In order to analyze the ability of different land surface models to simulate snow depth in China, we used atmospheric forcing data from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) to drive the CLM3.5 (the Community Land Model version 3.5), Noah (NCEP, OSU, Air Force and Office of Hydrology Land Surface Model), and Noah-MP (the community Noah land surface model with multi-parameterization options) land surface models. We also used 2380 daily snow-depth site observations of CMA to analyze the simulation effects of different models on the snow depth in China and different regions during the periods of snow accumulation and snowmelt from 2015 to 2019. The results show that CLM3.5, Noah, and Noah-MP can simulate the spatial distribution of the snow depth in China, but there are some differences between the models. In particular, the snow depth and snow cover simulated by CLM3.5 are lower than those simulated by Noah and Noah-MP in Northwest China and the Tibetan Plateau. From the overall quantitative assessment results for China, the snow depth simulated by CLM3.5 is underestimated, while that simulated by Noah is overestimated. Noah-MP has the best overall performance; for example, the biases of the three models during the snow-accumulation periods are -0.22 cm, 0.27 cm, and 0.15 cm, respectively. Furthermore, the three models perform differently in the three snowpack regions of Northeast China, Northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau; Noah-MP has the best snow-depth performance in Northeast China, while CLM3.5 has the best snow-depth performance in the Tibetan Plateau region. Noah-MP performs best in the snow-accumulation period, and Noah performs best in the snowmelt period for Northwest China. In conclusion, no single model can perform optimally for snow simulations in different regions of China and at different times of the year, and the multi-model integration of snow may be an effective way to obtain high-quality snow simulation results. So this study provides some scientific references for the spatiotemporal evolution of snow in the context of climate change, monitoring and analysis of snow, the study of land surface models for snow, and the sustainable development and utilization of snow resources in China and other regions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of ground temperature and permafrost conditions in the Arctic simulated by land surface process models of different complexity
    Mori', Junko
    Saito, Kazuyuki
    Miyazaki, Shin
    Machiya, Hirokazu
    Ise, Takeshi
    Sueyoshi, Tetsuo
    Yamazaki, Takeshi
    Iijima, Yoshihiro
    Ikawa, Hiroki
    O'oishi, Ryouta
    Ohta, Takeshi
    Katata, Genki
    Kotani, Ayumi
    Sato, Atsushi
    Sato, Hisashi
    Sugimoto, Atsuko
    Suzuki, Rikie
    Tanaka, Katsunori
    Nitta, Tomoko
    Hajima, Tomohiro
    Burke, Eleanor
    Park, Hotaek
    BULLETIN OF GLACIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 42 : 69 - 94
  • [42] Comparison of the climate simulated by the CCM3 coupled to two different land-surface models
    Delire, C
    Levis, S
    Bonan, G
    Foley, JA
    Coe, M
    Vavrus, S
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2002, 19 (08) : 657 - 669
  • [43] Comparison of the climate simulated by the CCM3 coupled to two different land-surface models
    Delire C.
    Levis S.
    Bonan G.
    Foley J.
    Coe M.
    Vavrus S.
    Climate Dynamics, 2002, 19 (8) : 657 - 670
  • [44] Comparison of energy fluxes at the land surface- atmosphere interface in an Alpine valley as simulated with different models
    Grossi, G
    Falappi, L
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (06) : 920 - 936
  • [45] Improving the precision of simulated hydrologic fluxes in land surface models
    Dong, JR
    Salvucci, GD
    Myneni, RB
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D13) : 14357 - 14368
  • [46] An evaluation of the surface radiation budget over North America for a suite of regional climate models against surface station observations
    Marko Markovic
    Colin G. Jones
    Paul A. Vaillancourt
    Dominique Paquin
    Katja Winger
    Danahé Paquin-Ricard
    Climate Dynamics, 2008, 31 : 779 - 794
  • [47] An evaluation of the surface radiation budget over North America for a suite of regional climate models against surface station observations
    Markovic, Marko
    Jones, Colin G.
    Vaillancourt, Paul A.
    Paquin, Dominique
    Winger, Katja
    Paquin-Ricard, Danahe
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2008, 31 (7-8) : 779 - 794
  • [48] Validation of VEGETATION, MODIS, and GOES plus SSM/I snow-cover products over Canada based on surface snow depth observations
    Simic, A
    Fernandes, R
    Brown, R
    Romanov, P
    Park, W
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (06) : 1089 - 1104
  • [49] Irrigation cooling effect on land surface temperature across China based on satellite observations
    Yang, Qiquan
    Huang, Xin
    Tang, Qiuhong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 705
  • [50] Using land surface microwave emissivities to isolate the signature of snow on different surface types
    Shahroudi, Narges
    Rossow, William
    Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 152 : 638 - 653