The Evaluation of Snow Depth Simulated by Different Land Surface Models in China Based on Station Observations

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Chunxiang [2 ]
Liang, Xiao [2 ]
Zhang, Shuai [3 ]
Gu, Junxia [2 ]
Han, Shuai [2 ]
Jiang, Hui [2 ]
Xu, Bin [2 ]
Yu, Qingbo [4 ]
Liang, Yujing [2 ]
Deng, Shuai [2 ]
机构
[1] Key Lab Coupling Proc & Effect Nat Resources Eleme, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Meteorol Informat Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Urban Meteorol Beijing, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[4] Meteorol Informat & Network Ctr Jilin Prov, Changchun 130062, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
snow depth; CMA Land Data Assimilation System; CLM3.5; Noah; Noah-MP; assessment; SOIL-MOISTURE; COVER; ASSIMILATION; CLIMATE; RISK; PRECIPITATION; DISASTER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/su151411284
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Snow plays an important role in catastrophic weather, climate change, and water recycling. In order to analyze the ability of different land surface models to simulate snow depth in China, we used atmospheric forcing data from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) to drive the CLM3.5 (the Community Land Model version 3.5), Noah (NCEP, OSU, Air Force and Office of Hydrology Land Surface Model), and Noah-MP (the community Noah land surface model with multi-parameterization options) land surface models. We also used 2380 daily snow-depth site observations of CMA to analyze the simulation effects of different models on the snow depth in China and different regions during the periods of snow accumulation and snowmelt from 2015 to 2019. The results show that CLM3.5, Noah, and Noah-MP can simulate the spatial distribution of the snow depth in China, but there are some differences between the models. In particular, the snow depth and snow cover simulated by CLM3.5 are lower than those simulated by Noah and Noah-MP in Northwest China and the Tibetan Plateau. From the overall quantitative assessment results for China, the snow depth simulated by CLM3.5 is underestimated, while that simulated by Noah is overestimated. Noah-MP has the best overall performance; for example, the biases of the three models during the snow-accumulation periods are -0.22 cm, 0.27 cm, and 0.15 cm, respectively. Furthermore, the three models perform differently in the three snowpack regions of Northeast China, Northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau; Noah-MP has the best snow-depth performance in Northeast China, while CLM3.5 has the best snow-depth performance in the Tibetan Plateau region. Noah-MP performs best in the snow-accumulation period, and Noah performs best in the snowmelt period for Northwest China. In conclusion, no single model can perform optimally for snow simulations in different regions of China and at different times of the year, and the multi-model integration of snow may be an effective way to obtain high-quality snow simulation results. So this study provides some scientific references for the spatiotemporal evolution of snow in the context of climate change, monitoring and analysis of snow, the study of land surface models for snow, and the sustainable development and utilization of snow resources in China and other regions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Point-to-Surface Upscaling Algorithms for Snow Depth Ground Observations
    Hou, Yingxu
    Huang, Xiaodong
    Zhao, Lin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [22] Comparative evaluation of VIIRS daily snow cover product with MODIS for snow detection in China based on ground observations
    Zhang, Hongbo
    Zhang, Fan
    Che, Tao
    Wang, Shijin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 724
  • [23] Evaluation of the Snow Cover in the Soil, Vegetation, and Snow (SVS) Land Surface Model
    Leonardini, Gonzalo
    Anctil, Francois
    Vionnet, Vincent
    Abrahamowicz, Maria
    Nadeau, Daniel F.
    Fortin, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2021, 22 (06) : 1663 - 1680
  • [24] Falsification-Oriented Signature-Based Evaluation for Guiding the Development of Land Surface Models and the Enhancement of Observations
    Zheng, Hui
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    Lin, Peirong
    Wu, Wen-Ying
    Li, Lingcheng
    Xu, Zhongfeng
    Wei, Jiangfeng
    Zhao, Long
    Bian, Qingyun
    Wang, Shu
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [25] Land Surface Models Evaluation for Two Different Land-Cover Types: Cropland and Forest
    Kim, Daeun
    Kang, Seokkoo
    Choi, Minha
    TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2016, 27 (01): : 153 - 167
  • [26] Uncertainty in solid precipitation and snow depth prediction for Siberia using the Noah and Noah-MP land surface models
    Kazuyoshi Suzuki
    Milija Zupanski
    Frontiers of Earth Science, 2018, 12 : 672 - 682
  • [27] Assessing the Sensitivity of Snow Depth Simulations to Land Surface Parameterizations within Noah-MP in Northern Xinjiang, China
    You, Yuanhong
    Huang, Chunlin
    Zhang, Yuhao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [28] Uncertainty in solid precipitation and snow depth prediction for Siberia using the Noah and Noah-MP land surface models
    Suzuki, Kazuyoshi
    Zupanski, Milija
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2018, 12 (04) : 672 - 682
  • [29] Evaluation of Snow Albedo in Land Models for Weather and Climate Studies
    Wang, Zhuo
    Zeng, Xubin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (03) : 363 - 380
  • [30] Validation of MODIS, VEGETATION, and GOES plus SSM/I snow cover products over Canada based on surface snow depth observations
    Simic, A
    Fernandes, R
    Brown, R
    Romanov, P
    Park, W
    Hall, DK
    Ca, ASNG
    IGARSS 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I - VII, PROCEEDINGS: LEARNING FROM EARTH'S SHAPES AND SIZES, 2003, : 836 - 838