The Evaluation of Snow Depth Simulated by Different Land Surface Models in China Based on Station Observations

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Chunxiang [2 ]
Liang, Xiao [2 ]
Zhang, Shuai [3 ]
Gu, Junxia [2 ]
Han, Shuai [2 ]
Jiang, Hui [2 ]
Xu, Bin [2 ]
Yu, Qingbo [4 ]
Liang, Yujing [2 ]
Deng, Shuai [2 ]
机构
[1] Key Lab Coupling Proc & Effect Nat Resources Eleme, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Meteorol Informat Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Urban Meteorol Beijing, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[4] Meteorol Informat & Network Ctr Jilin Prov, Changchun 130062, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
snow depth; CMA Land Data Assimilation System; CLM3.5; Noah; Noah-MP; assessment; SOIL-MOISTURE; COVER; ASSIMILATION; CLIMATE; RISK; PRECIPITATION; DISASTER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/su151411284
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Snow plays an important role in catastrophic weather, climate change, and water recycling. In order to analyze the ability of different land surface models to simulate snow depth in China, we used atmospheric forcing data from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) to drive the CLM3.5 (the Community Land Model version 3.5), Noah (NCEP, OSU, Air Force and Office of Hydrology Land Surface Model), and Noah-MP (the community Noah land surface model with multi-parameterization options) land surface models. We also used 2380 daily snow-depth site observations of CMA to analyze the simulation effects of different models on the snow depth in China and different regions during the periods of snow accumulation and snowmelt from 2015 to 2019. The results show that CLM3.5, Noah, and Noah-MP can simulate the spatial distribution of the snow depth in China, but there are some differences between the models. In particular, the snow depth and snow cover simulated by CLM3.5 are lower than those simulated by Noah and Noah-MP in Northwest China and the Tibetan Plateau. From the overall quantitative assessment results for China, the snow depth simulated by CLM3.5 is underestimated, while that simulated by Noah is overestimated. Noah-MP has the best overall performance; for example, the biases of the three models during the snow-accumulation periods are -0.22 cm, 0.27 cm, and 0.15 cm, respectively. Furthermore, the three models perform differently in the three snowpack regions of Northeast China, Northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau; Noah-MP has the best snow-depth performance in Northeast China, while CLM3.5 has the best snow-depth performance in the Tibetan Plateau region. Noah-MP performs best in the snow-accumulation period, and Noah performs best in the snowmelt period for Northwest China. In conclusion, no single model can perform optimally for snow simulations in different regions of China and at different times of the year, and the multi-model integration of snow may be an effective way to obtain high-quality snow simulation results. So this study provides some scientific references for the spatiotemporal evolution of snow in the context of climate change, monitoring and analysis of snow, the study of land surface models for snow, and the sustainable development and utilization of snow resources in China and other regions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combined use of satellite and surface observations to study aerosol optical depth in different regions of China
    Mikalai Filonchyk
    Haowen Yan
    Zhongrong Zhang
    Shuwen Yang
    Wei Li
    Yanming Li
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [32] Impacts of land cover transitions on surface temperature in China based on satellite observations
    Zhang, Yuzhen
    Liang, Shunlin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [33] Combined use of satellite and surface observations to study aerosol optical depth in different regions of China
    Filonchyk, Mikalai
    Yan, Haowen
    Zhang, Zhongrong
    Yang, Shuwen
    Li, Wei
    Li, Yanming
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [34] Land Surface Snow Phenology Based on an Improved Downscaling Method in the Southern Gansu Plateau, China
    Wu, Lei
    Li, Changbin
    Xie, Xuhong
    Lv, Jianan
    Zou, Songbing
    Zhou, Xuan
    Shen, Na
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [35] An evaluation of snow accumulation and ablation processes for land surface modelling
    Pomeroy, JW
    Gray, DM
    Shook, KR
    Toth, B
    Essery, RLH
    Pietroniro, A
    Hedstrom, N
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1998, 12 (15) : 2339 - 2367
  • [36] Snow interception modelling: Isolated observations have led to many land surface models lacking appropriate temperature sensitivities
    Lundquist, Jessica D.
    Dickerson-Lange, Susan
    Gutmann, Ethan
    Jonas, Tobias
    Lumbrazo, Cassie
    Reynolds, Dylan
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2021, 35 (07)
  • [37] Biophysics and vegetation cover change: a process-based evaluation framework for confronting land surface models with satellite observations
    Duveiller, Gregory
    Forzieri, Giovanni
    Robertson, Eddy
    Li, Wei
    Georgievski, Goran
    Lawrence, Peter
    Wiltshire, Andy
    Ciais, Philippe
    Pongratz, Julia
    Sitch, Stephen
    Arneth, Almut
    Cescatti, Alessandro
    EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2018, 10 (03) : 1265 - 1279
  • [38] Snow Depth on Sea Ice and on Land in the Canadian Arctic from Long-Term Observations
    Hoi Ming Lam
    Geldsetzer, Torsten
    Howell, Stephen E. L.
    Yackel, John
    ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2023, 61 (04) : 217 - 233
  • [39] Land-Surface-Atmosphere Coupling in Observations and Models
    Betts, Alan K.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2009, 1
  • [40] Snow Depth Inversion Based on Simulated Pixel-Scale Ground Measurements
    Ma, Ying
    Huang, Xiaodong
    Li, Yuxin
    Feng, Qisheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62 : 1 - 12