Comparison of ground temperature and permafrost conditions in the Arctic simulated by land surface process models of different complexity

被引:0
|
作者
Mori', Junko
Saito, Kazuyuki [1 ]
Miyazaki, Shin [2 ]
Machiya, Hirokazu [1 ]
Ise, Takeshi [3 ]
Sueyoshi, Tetsuo [1 ]
Yamazaki, Takeshi [4 ]
Iijima, Yoshihiro [5 ]
Ikawa, Hiroki [6 ]
O'oishi, Ryouta [7 ]
Ohta, Takeshi [8 ]
Katata, Genki [9 ]
Kotani, Ayumi [8 ]
Sato, Atsushi
Sato, Hisashi
Sugimoto, Atsuko [10 ]
Suzuki, Rikie [1 ]
Tanaka, Katsunori [11 ]
Nitta, Tomoko [12 ]
Hajima, Tomohiro [1 ]
Burke, Eleanor [13 ]
Park, Hotaek [14 ]
机构
[1] JAMSTEC, Showa Machi Kanazawa Ku, Yokohama 2360001, Japan
[2] Son Corp, Mizuho Cho, Nishitama 1901295, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Oiwake Cho,Sakyo ku, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Aza Aoba,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808578, Japan
[5] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Hachioji 1920397, Japan
[6] Hokkaido Agr Res Ctr, Toyohira Ku, Sapporo 0628555, Japan
[7] Univ Tokyo, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778568, Japan
[8] Nagoya Univ, Furo Cho,Chikusa Ku, Nagoya 4648601, Japan
[9] Canon Inst Global Studies, Tokyo, Tokyo 1006511, Japan
[10] Hokkaido Univ, Kita, Sapporo 0600810, Japan
[11] Grid Inc, Ao Bldg,6F,3-11-7 Kitaaoyma,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1070061, Japan
[12] Univ Tokyo, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778574, Japan
[13] Met Off, FitzRoy Rd, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England
[14] JAMSTEC, Natsushima Cho, Yokosuka 2370061, Japan
关键词
Terrestrial Arctic; Model Intercomparison; Permafrost; Surface and Subsurface Insulation; Snowpack; SIBERIAN LARCH FOREST; CLIMATE-CHANGE; THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; SNOW COVER; WATER; SOIL; DYNAMICS; ENERGY; TUNDRA; CMIP5;
D O I
10.5331/bgr23A02
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Permafrost and ground freezing/thawing processes are physically and eco-climatologically important factors in the terrestrial cryosphere. The model reproducibility of frozen ground affects the certainty and reliability of simulated eco-climate conditions in cold regions as well as on a global scale. This study evaluated the variations and their attributes in the model performance developed and employed in the recent decade regarding the subsurface thermal state using outputs from Japanese and international model intercomparison projects and reanalysis data. The simulated surface and subsurface physical states were compared at four Arctic sites under different frozen ground conditions (Fairbanks, Kevo, Tiksi, and Yakutsk). The results showed that despite large variations in the modeled permafrost temperature, all the models, including the reanalysis data, successfully reproduced the permafrost conditions for the continuous permafrost sites. In contrast, some models failed to reproduce the presence of permafrost for the sites in the discontinuous to isolated permafrost zones. Evaluations of near-surface ground temperature variability revealed that the overall wellness of the simulated ground thermal states relied on winter reproducibility. The importance of snowpack metamorphosis for adequate thermal insulation was confirmed and demonstrated. The results at the coastal tundra site imply the importance of snow cover redistribution and wind crust formation owing to strong winds, the lack of which resulted in overestimations of thermal insulation and overcooled near-surface ground by most models.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 94
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of MODIS-derived land surface temperatures with ground surface and air temperature measurements in continuous permafrost terrain
    Hachem, S.
    Duguay, C. R.
    Allard, M.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2012, 6 (01): : 51 - 69
  • [2] Evaluation of air-soil temperature relationships simulated by land surface models during winter across the permafrost region
    Wang, Wenli
    Rinke, Annette
    Moore, John C.
    Ji, Duoying
    Cui, Xuefeng
    Peng, Shushi
    Lawrence, David M.
    McGuire, A. David
    Burke, Eleanor J.
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Decharme, Bertrand
    Koven, Charles
    MacDougall, Andrew
    Saito, Kazuyuki
    Zhang, Wenxin
    Alkama, Ramdane
    Bohn, Theodore J.
    Ciais, Philippe
    Delire, Christine
    Gouttevin, Isabelle
    Hajima, Tomohiro
    Krinner, Gerhard
    Lettenmaier, Dennis P.
    Miller, Paul A.
    Smith, Benjamin
    Sueyoshi, Tetsuo
    Sherstiukov, Artem B.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2016, 10 (04): : 1721 - 1737
  • [3] Ground surface temperature simulation for different land covers
    Herb, William R.
    Janke, Ben
    Mohseni, Omid
    Stefan, Heinz G.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 356 (3-4) : 327 - 343
  • [4] Comparison of the climate simulated by the CCM3 coupled to two different land-surface models
    Delire, C
    Levis, S
    Bonan, G
    Foley, JA
    Coe, M
    Vavrus, S
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2002, 19 (08) : 657 - 669
  • [5] Comparison of the climate simulated by the CCM3 coupled to two different land-surface models
    Delire C.
    Levis S.
    Bonan G.
    Foley J.
    Coe M.
    Vavrus S.
    Climate Dynamics, 2002, 19 (8) : 657 - 670
  • [6] Comparison of energy fluxes at the land surface- atmosphere interface in an Alpine valley as simulated with different models
    Grossi, G
    Falappi, L
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (06) : 920 - 936
  • [7] Parameter sensitivity analysis for different complexity land surface models using multicriteria methods
    Bastidas, L. A.
    Hogue, T. S.
    Sorooshian, S.
    Gupta, H. V.
    Shuttleworth, W. J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D20)
  • [8] A comparison of different regression models for downscaling Landsat and MODIS land surface temperature images over heterogeneous landscape
    Mukherjee, Sandip
    Joshi, P. K.
    Garg, R. D.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2014, 54 (04) : 655 - 669
  • [9] Accuracy Comparison of Near Surface Air Temperature Estimation Using Different Land Surface Temperature Sources
    Xu H.
    Gao M.
    Li Z.
    Hu Y.
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48 (04): : 568 - 578
  • [10] The Evaluation of Snow Depth Simulated by Different Land Surface Models in China Based on Station Observations
    Sun, Shuai
    Shi, Chunxiang
    Liang, Xiao
    Zhang, Shuai
    Gu, Junxia
    Han, Shuai
    Jiang, Hui
    Xu, Bin
    Yu, Qingbo
    Liang, Yujing
    Deng, Shuai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (14)