Dynamic Assessment and Sustainability Strategies of Ecological Security in the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China

被引:10
|
作者
Fan, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Abudumanan, Ahemaitihali [3 ]
Wang, Li [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Daojing [2 ]
Wang, Zhao [2 ,4 ]
Liu, Hanchu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecological security; obstacle factors; Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model; drylands; watershed; Irtysh River Basin; DPSIR FRAMEWORK; DESERTIFICATION; REACHES;
D O I
10.1007/s11769-023-1347-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The drylands of China are extensive, and they are home to more than one-third of the country's population. However, the watershed territories of the drylands, where the majority of human activities are concentrated have long experienced strained human-land relationships, culminating in ecological security concerns. Correspondingly, it is essential to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the ecological security of dryland watersheds and to identify the key factors influencing ecological security in order to formulate strategies that ensure the sustainability of drylands. Premised on the Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model, this study developed an ecological security index and applied it to the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2020. The obstacle degree model was applied to reveal the obstacles in two dimensions: criterion level and indicator level. The findings suggested that the ecological security comprehensive index in the Irtysh River Basin has increased significantly from 2000 to 2020, irrespective of the fact that it decreased during the study period and then increased. The ecological security level changed from 'critically safe' in 2000 to 'general safety' in 2020, with the state subsystem and pressure subsystem becoming ecological security weaknesses. The primary factors influencing the ecological security of the study area were water consumption, the area of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation, the proportion of wetland area, vegetation coverage, and livestock population. The ecological security of different counties in the basin varies greatly, whereas the factors that influence ecological security showed both similarities and differences among the counties. In light of on the findings, we proposed that future strategies for ecological security enhancement should concentrate on enacting the policy of localizing spatial differentiation, optimizing industrial structure, strengthening scientific and technological support in the field of water conservation, bolstering the treatment capacity of environmental facilities, and implementing the Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands System to support the sustainable development of dryland watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 409
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An improved method for integrated water security assessment in the Yellow River basin, China
    Xiaoli Jia
    Chunhui Li
    Yanpeng Cai
    Xuan Wang
    Lian Sun
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2015, 29 : 2213 - 2227
  • [42] An improved method for integrated water security assessment in the Yellow River basin, China
    Jia, Xiaoli
    Li, Chunhui
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Wang, Xuan
    Sun, Lian
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 29 (08) : 2213 - 2227
  • [43] Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Kriya River Basin in Xinjiang and Its Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis
    Li, Jinbao
    He, Xuemin
    Huang, Pengcheng
    Wang, Zizheng
    Wang, Ranran
    WATER, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [44] Construction and Analysis of the Ecological Security Pattern in Territorial Space in Shaanxi of the Yellow River Basin, China
    Liu, Zhengyao
    Huang, Jing
    Liu, Xiaokang
    Li, Yonghong
    He, Yiping
    ATMOSPHERE, 2025, 16 (02)
  • [45] Methodology for Mapping the Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Network in the Arid Region of Xinjiang, China
    Wang, Yishan
    Zhang, Fei
    Li, Xingyou
    Johnson, Verner Carl
    Tan, Mou Leong
    Kung, Hsiang-Te
    Shi, Jingchao
    Bahtebay, Jupar
    He, Xin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [46] Assessment of the restoration potential for ecological sustainability in the Xijiang River basin, Southwest China: A comparative analysis of karst and non-karst areas
    Liu, Yeye
    Lian, Jinjiao
    Chen, Hongsong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 912
  • [47] Spatial distribution and health risk assessment of fluoride in groundwater in the oasis of the Hotan river basin in Xinjiang, China
    Li, Ling
    Ma, Long
    Pan, Zhilin
    Xu, Juan
    Chen, Fei
    Yang, Changde
    Yin, Yidan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [48] Circuit theory-based ecological security pattern could promote ecological protection in the Heihe River Basin of China
    Yingdi Wu
    Ziyan Han
    Jijun Meng
    Likai Zhu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 27340 - 27356
  • [49] Assessing Ecological Quality Dynamics and Driving Factors in the Irtysh River Basin Using AWBEI and OPGD Approaches
    Luo, Kaiyue
    Samat, Alim
    van de Voorde, Tim
    Li, Wenbo
    Xu, Wenqiang
    Abuduwaili, Jilili
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 18 : 1153 - 1173
  • [50] Hydrogeochemical characteristics and groundwater quality assessment in the plain area of Yarkant River Basin in Xinjiang, PR China
    Zhang, Jie
    Zhou, Jinlong
    Zhou, Yinzhu
    Zeng, Yanyan
    Ji, Yuanyuan
    Sun, Ying
    Lei, Mi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (24) : 31704 - 31716