Dynamic Assessment and Sustainability Strategies of Ecological Security in the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China

被引:10
|
作者
Fan, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Abudumanan, Ahemaitihali [3 ]
Wang, Li [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Daojing [2 ]
Wang, Zhao [2 ,4 ]
Liu, Hanchu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecological security; obstacle factors; Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model; drylands; watershed; Irtysh River Basin; DPSIR FRAMEWORK; DESERTIFICATION; REACHES;
D O I
10.1007/s11769-023-1347-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The drylands of China are extensive, and they are home to more than one-third of the country's population. However, the watershed territories of the drylands, where the majority of human activities are concentrated have long experienced strained human-land relationships, culminating in ecological security concerns. Correspondingly, it is essential to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the ecological security of dryland watersheds and to identify the key factors influencing ecological security in order to formulate strategies that ensure the sustainability of drylands. Premised on the Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model, this study developed an ecological security index and applied it to the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2020. The obstacle degree model was applied to reveal the obstacles in two dimensions: criterion level and indicator level. The findings suggested that the ecological security comprehensive index in the Irtysh River Basin has increased significantly from 2000 to 2020, irrespective of the fact that it decreased during the study period and then increased. The ecological security level changed from 'critically safe' in 2000 to 'general safety' in 2020, with the state subsystem and pressure subsystem becoming ecological security weaknesses. The primary factors influencing the ecological security of the study area were water consumption, the area of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation, the proportion of wetland area, vegetation coverage, and livestock population. The ecological security of different counties in the basin varies greatly, whereas the factors that influence ecological security showed both similarities and differences among the counties. In light of on the findings, we proposed that future strategies for ecological security enhancement should concentrate on enacting the policy of localizing spatial differentiation, optimizing industrial structure, strengthening scientific and technological support in the field of water conservation, bolstering the treatment capacity of environmental facilities, and implementing the Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands System to support the sustainable development of dryland watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 409
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landscape Ecological Security of the Lijiang River Basin in China: Spatiotemporal Evolution and Pattern Optimization
    Hu, Jinlong
    Qing, Guo
    Wang, Yingxue
    Qiu, Sicheng
    Luo, Nan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [32] A Comprehensive Assessment of the Ecological State of the Transboundary Irtysh River (Kazakhstan, Central Asia)
    Krupa, Elena
    Romanova, Sophia
    Serikova, Aizada
    Shakhvorostova, Larisa
    WATER, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [33] Identification of ecological restoration areas based on the ecological safety security assessment of wetland-hydrological ecological corridors: A case study of the Han River Basin in China
    Bian, Hongni
    Li, Mengru
    Deng, Yulin
    Zhang, Yu
    Liu, Yalei
    Wang, Qing
    Xie, Shangru
    Wang, Sixiang
    Zhang, Ziyan
    Wang, Ningtao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 160
  • [34] Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystem Health in the Irtysh River Basin Using eDNA Metabarcoding
    Song, Tianjian
    Zi, Fangze
    Huang, Yuxin
    Fang, Lei
    Zhang, Yuna
    Liu, Yu
    Chang, Jiang
    Li, Junsheng
    WATER, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [35] Environmental flow assessment for improvement of ecological integrity in the Haihe River Basin, China
    Tao Yang
    Jingling Liu
    Qiuying Chen
    Jing Zhang
    Yi Yang
    Ecotoxicology, 2014, 23 : 506 - 517
  • [36] Environmental flow assessment for improvement of ecological integrity in the Haihe River Basin, China
    Yang, Tao
    Liu, Jingling
    Chen, Qiuying
    Zhang, Jing
    Yang, Yi
    ECOTOXICOLOGY, 2014, 23 (04) : 506 - 517
  • [37] Fish Community Structure and Ecological Health Assessment of the Shuaishui River Basin, China
    Fang Y.X.
    Liu G.J.
    Liu R.J.
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2021, 20 (01) : 153 - 161
  • [38] Ecological Footprint and Ecological Security Evaluation in the Upper Min River Basin
    TU Jian-jun 1
    2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment
    Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2005, (04) : 641 - 646
  • [39] Regional sustainability: Pressures and responses of tourism economy and ecological environment in the Yangtze River basin, China
    Zhu, Kai
    Zhou, Quan
    Cheng, Yufeng
    Zhang, Youtian
    Li, Ting
    Yan, Xiaoyue
    Alimov, Atabek
    Farmanov, Erkin
    David, Lorant Denes
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [40] Ecological footprint and ecological security evaluation in the Upper Min River Basin
    Tu, Jian-Jun
    Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2005, 10 (04) : 641 - 646