Dynamic Assessment and Sustainability Strategies of Ecological Security in the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China

被引:10
|
作者
Fan, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Abudumanan, Ahemaitihali [3 ]
Wang, Li [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Daojing [2 ]
Wang, Zhao [2 ,4 ]
Liu, Hanchu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecological security; obstacle factors; Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model; drylands; watershed; Irtysh River Basin; DPSIR FRAMEWORK; DESERTIFICATION; REACHES;
D O I
10.1007/s11769-023-1347-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The drylands of China are extensive, and they are home to more than one-third of the country's population. However, the watershed territories of the drylands, where the majority of human activities are concentrated have long experienced strained human-land relationships, culminating in ecological security concerns. Correspondingly, it is essential to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the ecological security of dryland watersheds and to identify the key factors influencing ecological security in order to formulate strategies that ensure the sustainability of drylands. Premised on the Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model, this study developed an ecological security index and applied it to the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2020. The obstacle degree model was applied to reveal the obstacles in two dimensions: criterion level and indicator level. The findings suggested that the ecological security comprehensive index in the Irtysh River Basin has increased significantly from 2000 to 2020, irrespective of the fact that it decreased during the study period and then increased. The ecological security level changed from 'critically safe' in 2000 to 'general safety' in 2020, with the state subsystem and pressure subsystem becoming ecological security weaknesses. The primary factors influencing the ecological security of the study area were water consumption, the area of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation, the proportion of wetland area, vegetation coverage, and livestock population. The ecological security of different counties in the basin varies greatly, whereas the factors that influence ecological security showed both similarities and differences among the counties. In light of on the findings, we proposed that future strategies for ecological security enhancement should concentrate on enacting the policy of localizing spatial differentiation, optimizing industrial structure, strengthening scientific and technological support in the field of water conservation, bolstering the treatment capacity of environmental facilities, and implementing the Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands System to support the sustainable development of dryland watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 409
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ecological security pattern construction based on landscape ecological risk assessment in the Yellow River basin
    Yan, Jixuan
    Li, Jie
    Yao, Xiangdong
    Li, Qiang
    Zheng, Zhiqin
    Li, Guang
    Qi, Guangping
    Ma, Weiwei
    Song, Miao
    Gao, Pengcheng
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2025, 13
  • [22] Riparian Forest Health Assessment in the Valley Area of the Irtysh River Basin
    Yuan, Ye
    Li, Hongbin
    Wang, Hanyue
    Liu, Tong
    Xue, Zhifang
    Song, Jihu
    Xu, Ling
    FORESTS, 2025, 16 (02):
  • [23] Microplastic pollution characteristics and ecological risk assessment in the River Basin, China
    Wan, Shun
    Xu, Guoce
    Xiong, Ping
    Qiao, Hailiang
    Chen, Xin
    Gu, Liuyang
    Xiong, Haijing
    Wang, Bin
    Gu, Fengyou
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 356
  • [24] Integrated water security and coupling of social-ecological system to improve river basin sustainability
    Han, Ziyan
    Wei, Yongping
    Meng, Jijun
    Zou, Yi
    Wu, Qiqi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 905
  • [25] Study on Ecological Security and Ecological Compensation in the Songhua River Basin
    Zi, Tang
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 3377 - 3380
  • [26] The analysis of ecological security and ecological management in the Songhua River Basin
    Tang Zi
    Shang Jie
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (3RD), VOL II, 2007, : 144 - 149
  • [27] Ecohydrological Variation and Multi-Objective Ecological Water Demand of the Irtysh River Basin
    Wang, Dan
    Zhang, Shuanghu
    Wang, Guoli
    Gu, Jingjing
    Wang, Hao
    Chen, Xiaoting
    WATER, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [28] Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity and construction of ecological security pattern in West Liaohe River Basin of China
    Zheng, Ying
    Tang, Pengcheng
    Dong, Lei
    Yao, Zhenyu
    Guo, Jianying
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 12
  • [29] Ecological security assessment and ecological management zoning based on ecosystem services in the West Liao River Basin
    Hu, Yuxia
    Gong, Jirui
    Li, Xiaobing
    Song, Liangyuan
    Zhang, Zihe
    Zhang, Siqi
    Zhang, Weiyuan
    Dong, Jiaojiao
    Dong, Xuede
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 192
  • [30] Dynamic evolution characteristics and driving factors of tourism ecological security in the Yellow River Basin
    Mu, Xueqing
    Guo, Xiangyang
    Ming, Qingzhong
    Hu, Cheng
    Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77 (03): : 714 - 735