Virtual pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using deep learning

被引:3
|
作者
Yoganathan, S. A. [1 ]
Ahmed, Sharib [1 ]
Paloor, Satheesh [1 ]
Torfeh, Tarraf [1 ]
Aouadi, Souha [1 ]
Al-Hammadi, Noora [1 ]
Hammoud, Rabih [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Natl Ctr Canc Care & Res NCCCR, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 3050, Doha, Qatar
关键词
automatic; deep learning; gamma evaluation; QA; VMAT; ERROR-DETECTION; IMRT QA; RADIOMIC ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16567
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundAutomatic patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is recently explored using artificial intelligence approaches, and several studies reported the development of machine learning models for predicting the gamma pass rate (GPR) index only. PurposeTo develop a novel deep learning approach using a generative adversarial network (GAN) to predict the synthetic measured fluence. Methods and materialsA novel training method called "dual training," which involves the training of the encoder and decoder separately, was proposed and evaluated for cycle GAN (cycle-GAN) and conditional GAN (c-GAN). A total of 164 VMAT treatment plans, including 344 arcs (training data: 262, validation data: 30, and testing data: 52) from various treatment sites, were selected for prediction model development. For each patient, portal-dose-image-prediction fluence from TPS was used as input, and measured fluence from EPID was used as output/response for model training. Predicted GPR was derived by comparing the TPS fluence with the synthetic measured fluence generated by the DL models using gamma evaluation of criteria 2%/2 mm. The performance of dual training was compared against the traditional single-training approach. In addition, we also developed a separate classification model specifically designed to detect automatically three types of errors (rotational, translational, and MU-scale) in the synthetic EPID-measured fluence. ResultsOverall, the dual training improved the prediction accuracy of both cycle-GAN and c-GAN. Predicted GPR results of single training were within 3% for 71.2% and 78.8% of test cases for cycle-GAN and c-GAN, respectively. Moreover, similar results for dual training were 82.7% and 88.5% for cycle-GAN and c-GAN, respectively. The error detection model showed high classification accuracy (>98%) for detecting errors related to rotational and translational errors. However, it struggled to differentiate the fluences with "MU scale error" from "error-free" fluences. ConclusionWe developed a method to automatically generate the synthetic measured fluence and identify errors within them. The proposed dual training improved the PSQA prediction accuracy of both the GAN models, with c-GAN demonstrating superior performance over the cycle-GAN. Our results indicate that the c-GAN with dual training approach combined with error detection model, can accurately generate the synthetic measured fluence for VMAT PSQA and identify the errors. This approach has the potential to pave the way for virtual patient-specific QA of VMAT treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:7891 / 7903
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Statistical process control and process capability analysis for non-normal volumetric modulated arc therapy patient-specific quality assurance processes
    Xiao, Qing
    Bai, Sen
    Li, Guangjun
    Yang, Kaixuan
    Bai, Long
    Li, Zhibin
    Chen, Li
    Xian, Lixun
    Hu, Zhenyao
    Zhong, Renming
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (10) : 4694 - 4702
  • [42] Error detection model developed using a multi-task convolutional neural network in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Kimura, Yuto
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Oku, Yohei
    Kajikawa, Tomohiro
    Tomori, Seiji
    Jingu, Keiichi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (09) : 4769 - 4783
  • [43] Statistical analysis of correlation of gamma passing results for two quality assurance phantoms used for patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy
    Kunii, Yuki
    Tanabe, Yoshinori
    Nakamoto, Akira
    Nishioka, Kunio
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (04) : 329 - 333
  • [44] Patient Specific Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (RapidArc) Using COMPASS 3D Dosimetry System
    Arun, G.
    Subramanian, V. Shanmuga
    Swamy, S. Thirumalai
    Kathirvel, M.
    Ramalingam, K.
    Kala, S.
    Kumar, S. Ashok
    Karthikeyan, K.
    Anantharaman, A.
    Kumar, N. Jagdish
    Arivarasan, I.
    Babaiah, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [45] Characterization of a novel 2D array dosimeter for patient-specific quality assurance with volumetric arc therapy
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Myers, Pamela
    Esquivel, Carlos
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (07)
  • [46] Patient Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): Portal Dosimetry Compared with ArcCheck Phantom
    Utitsarn, K.
    Watthanasarn, T.
    Pimthong, J.
    Krongkietlearts, K.
    Pihusut, C.
    Chaloemchawalit, W.
    Jitmon, J.
    Khuanchana, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E826 - E826
  • [47] Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy for a prostate cancer patient with a hip prosthesis
    Ikeda, T.
    Moriwaki, H.
    Sakumi, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S595 - S595
  • [48] Multileaf Collimator Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Lin, T.
    Hossain, M.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3598 - U31
  • [49] Quality assurance of dynamic parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Manikandan, A.
    Sarkar, B.
    Holla, R.
    Vivek, T. R.
    Sujatha, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1015): : 1002 - 1010
  • [50] Evidence based quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Tuemmler, H.
    Bellmann, C.
    Schilling, P.
    Schreiber, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S117 - S117