A dual-frame approach for estimation with respondent-driven samples

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Chien-Min [1 ]
Breidt, F. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Stat & Data Sci, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
来源
关键词
Inverse propensity estimator; Network sampling; Nonprobability sample; Project; 90; NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES; PROBABILITY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40300-023-00241-8
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an increasingly common method for surveying rare, hidden, or otherwise hard-to-reach populations. Instead of formal probability sampling from a well-defined frame, RDS relies on respondents themselves to recruit additional participants through their own social networks. By necessity, RDS is often initiated with a small, non-random sample. Standard RDS estimators have been developed under strong assumptions on the diffusion of sampling through the network over multiple waves of recruitment. We consider an alternative setting in which these assumptions are not met, and instead a large probability sample is used to initiate RDS and only a few waves of recruitment take place. In this setting, we develop dual-frame estimators that use both known inclusion probabilities from the initial sampling design and estimated inclusion probabilities from RDS, treated as a nonprobability sample. In a simulation study using network data from the Project 90 study, our dual-frame estimators perform well relative to standard RDS alternatives, across a wide range of recruitment behaviors. We propose a simple variance estimator that yields stable estimates and reasonable confidence interval coverage. Finally, we apply our dual-frame estimators to a real RDS study of smoking behavior among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Respondent-driven sampling to recruit adolescents in Kenya
    Truong, Hong-Ha M.
    Fatch, Robin
    Ogolla, David
    Otieno, Beatrice
    Amboka, Sayo
    Kadede, Kevin
    Cohen, Craig R.
    Bukusi, Elizabeth A.
    Guze, Mary A.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 78 : 68 - 73
  • [42] Respondent-Driven Sampling and Sparse Graph Convergence
    Athreya, Siva
    Roellin, Adrian
    ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN PROBABILITY, 2018, 23
  • [43] EVALUATING VARIANCE ESTIMATORS FOR RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING
    Spiller, Michael W.
    Gile, Krista J.
    Handcock, Mark S.
    Mar, Corinne M.
    Wejnert, Cyprian
    JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2018, 6 (01) : 23 - 45
  • [44] Asymptotic seed bias in respondent-driven sampling
    Yan, Yuling
    Hanlon, Bret
    Roch, Sebastien
    Rohe, Karl
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2020, 14 (01): : 1577 - 1610
  • [45] RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING WITH LGBT OLDER ADULTS
    Williams, M.
    Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I.
    Erosheva, E.
    Kim, H.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 594 - 595
  • [46] Respondent-driven sampling and the homophily configuration graph
    Fellows, Ian E.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (01) : 131 - 150
  • [47] COMMENT: SNOWBALL VERSUS RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING
    Heckathorn, Douglas D.
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2011, VOL 41, 2011, 41 : 355 - 366
  • [48] Novel sampling design for respondent-driven sampling
    Khabbazian, Mohammad
    Hanlon, Bret
    Russek, Zoe
    Rohe, Karl
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2017, 11 (02): : 4769 - 4812
  • [49] Estimation of Non-Linear Parameters with Data Collected Using Respondent-Driven Sampling
    Sanchez-Borrego, Ismael
    Rueda, Maria del Mar
    Mullo, Hector
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (08)
  • [50] Differential Profiles of Crack Users in Respondent-Driven and Institutional Samples: A Three-Site Comparison
    Perez, Alberto Oteo
    Benschop, Annemieke
    Korf, Dirk J.
    EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (04) : 184 - 192