A dual-frame approach for estimation with respondent-driven samples

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Chien-Min [1 ]
Breidt, F. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Stat & Data Sci, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
来源
关键词
Inverse propensity estimator; Network sampling; Nonprobability sample; Project; 90; NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES; PROBABILITY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40300-023-00241-8
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an increasingly common method for surveying rare, hidden, or otherwise hard-to-reach populations. Instead of formal probability sampling from a well-defined frame, RDS relies on respondents themselves to recruit additional participants through their own social networks. By necessity, RDS is often initiated with a small, non-random sample. Standard RDS estimators have been developed under strong assumptions on the diffusion of sampling through the network over multiple waves of recruitment. We consider an alternative setting in which these assumptions are not met, and instead a large probability sample is used to initiate RDS and only a few waves of recruitment take place. In this setting, we develop dual-frame estimators that use both known inclusion probabilities from the initial sampling design and estimated inclusion probabilities from RDS, treated as a nonprobability sample. In a simulation study using network data from the Project 90 study, our dual-frame estimators perform well relative to standard RDS alternatives, across a wide range of recruitment behaviors. We propose a simple variance estimator that yields stable estimates and reasonable confidence interval coverage. Finally, we apply our dual-frame estimators to a real RDS study of smoking behavior among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neighborhood Bootstrap for Respondent-Driven Sampling
    Yauck, Mamadou
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Apelian, Herak
    Fourmigue, Alain
    Grace, Daniel
    Hart, Trevor A.
    Lambert, Gilles
    Cox, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2022, 10 (02) : 419 - 438
  • [22] INFERENCE FOR RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING WITH MISCLASSIFICATION
    Beaudry, Isabelle S.
    Gile, Krista J.
    Mehta, Shruti H.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2017, 11 (04): : 2111 - 2141
  • [23] Towards the Estimation of Effect Measures in Studies Using Respondent-Driven Sampling
    Rotondi, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2014, 91 (03): : 592 - 597
  • [24] POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION USING MULTIPLE RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING SURVEYS
    Kim, Brian J.
    Handcock, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2021, 9 (01) : 94 - 120
  • [25] Respondent-driven Sampling in the Real World
    Salganik, Matthew J.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 148 - 150
  • [26] AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING
    McCreesh, N.
    Frost, S.
    Seeley, J.
    Katongole, J.
    Tarsh, M. Ndagire
    Ndungutse, R.
    Jichi, F.
    Maher, D.
    Sonnenberg, P.
    Copas, A.
    Hayes, R. J.
    White, R. G.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2011, 87 : A15 - A16
  • [27] Respondent-driven sampling on directed networks
    Lu, Xin
    Malmros, Jens
    Liljeros, Fredrik
    Britton, Tom
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2013, 7 : 292 - 322
  • [28] Respondent-Driven Sampling and Spatial Autocorrelation
    Morris, E. Scott
    Thakar, Vaishnavi
    Griffith, Daniel A.
    ADVANCES IN GEOCOMPUTATION, 2017, : 241 - 251
  • [29] Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling
    Salganik, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2006, 83 (06): : I98 - I112
  • [30] Estimation and correction of bias in network simulations based on respondent-driven sampling data
    Zhu, Lin
    Menzies, Nicolas A.
    Wang, Jianing
    Linas, Benjamin P.
    Goodreau, Steven M.
    Salomon, Joshua A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)