A dual-frame approach for estimation with respondent-driven samples

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Chien-Min [1 ]
Breidt, F. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Stat & Data Sci, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
来源
关键词
Inverse propensity estimator; Network sampling; Nonprobability sample; Project; 90; NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES; PROBABILITY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40300-023-00241-8
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an increasingly common method for surveying rare, hidden, or otherwise hard-to-reach populations. Instead of formal probability sampling from a well-defined frame, RDS relies on respondents themselves to recruit additional participants through their own social networks. By necessity, RDS is often initiated with a small, non-random sample. Standard RDS estimators have been developed under strong assumptions on the diffusion of sampling through the network over multiple waves of recruitment. We consider an alternative setting in which these assumptions are not met, and instead a large probability sample is used to initiate RDS and only a few waves of recruitment take place. In this setting, we develop dual-frame estimators that use both known inclusion probabilities from the initial sampling design and estimated inclusion probabilities from RDS, treated as a nonprobability sample. In a simulation study using network data from the Project 90 study, our dual-frame estimators perform well relative to standard RDS alternatives, across a wide range of recruitment behaviors. We propose a simple variance estimator that yields stable estimates and reasonable confidence interval coverage. Finally, we apply our dual-frame estimators to a real RDS study of smoking behavior among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The sensitivity of respondent-driven sampling
    Lu, Xin
    Bengtsson, Linus
    Britton, Tom
    Camitz, Martin
    Kim, Beom Jun
    Thorson, Anna
    Liljeros, Fredrik
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2012, 175 : 191 - 216
  • [12] Evaluation of Respondent-driven Sampling
    McCreesh, Nicky
    Frost, Simon D. W.
    Seeley, Janet
    Katongole, Joseph
    Tarsh, Matilda N.
    Ndunguse, Richard
    Jichi, Fatima
    Lunel, Natasha L.
    Maher, Dermot
    Johnston, Lisa G.
    Sonnenberg, Pam
    Copas, Andrew J.
    Hayes, Richard J.
    White, Richard G.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 138 - 147
  • [13] Diagnostics for respondent-driven sampling
    Gile, Krista J.
    Johnston, Lisa G.
    Salganik, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2015, 178 (01) : 241 - 269
  • [14] ASSESSING RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING
    Goel, S.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2011, 87 : A15 - A15
  • [15] A single weighting approach to analyze respondent-driven sampling data
    Selvaraj, Vadivoo
    Boopathi, Kangusamy
    Paranjape, Ramesh
    Mehendale, Sanjay
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 144 : 447 - 459
  • [16] Nonparametric identification for respondent-driven sampling
    Aronow, Peter M.
    Crawford, Forrest W.
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2015, 106 : 100 - 102
  • [17] RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING AND AN UNUSUAL EPIDEMIC
    Malmros, J.
    Liljeros, F.
    Britton, T.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2016, 53 (02) : 518 - 530
  • [18] Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations
    Heckathorn, DD
    SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1997, 44 (02) : 174 - 199
  • [19] Towards the Estimation of Effect Measures in Studies Using Respondent-Driven Sampling
    Michael A. Rotondi
    Journal of Urban Health, 2014, 91 : 592 - 597
  • [20] THE GRAPHICAL STRUCTURE OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING
    Crawford, Forrest W.
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 46, 2016, 46 : 187 - 211