A dual-frame approach for estimation with respondent-driven samples

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Chien-Min [1 ]
Breidt, F. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Stat & Data Sci, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
来源
关键词
Inverse propensity estimator; Network sampling; Nonprobability sample; Project; 90; NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES; PROBABILITY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40300-023-00241-8
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an increasingly common method for surveying rare, hidden, or otherwise hard-to-reach populations. Instead of formal probability sampling from a well-defined frame, RDS relies on respondents themselves to recruit additional participants through their own social networks. By necessity, RDS is often initiated with a small, non-random sample. Standard RDS estimators have been developed under strong assumptions on the diffusion of sampling through the network over multiple waves of recruitment. We consider an alternative setting in which these assumptions are not met, and instead a large probability sample is used to initiate RDS and only a few waves of recruitment take place. In this setting, we develop dual-frame estimators that use both known inclusion probabilities from the initial sampling design and estimated inclusion probabilities from RDS, treated as a nonprobability sample. In a simulation study using network data from the Project 90 study, our dual-frame estimators perform well relative to standard RDS alternatives, across a wide range of recruitment behaviors. We propose a simple variance estimator that yields stable estimates and reasonable confidence interval coverage. Finally, we apply our dual-frame estimators to a real RDS study of smoking behavior among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation
    Gile, Krista J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (493) : 135 - 146
  • [32] Estimation and correction of bias in network simulations based on respondent-driven sampling data
    Lin Zhu
    Nicolas A. Menzies
    Jianing Wang
    Benjamin P. Linas
    Steven M. Goodreau
    Joshua A. Salomon
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [33] MODELING THE VISIBILITY DISTRIBUTION FOR RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING WITH APPLICATION TO POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION
    Mclaughlin, Katherine R.
    Johnston, Lisa G.
    Jakupi, Xhevat
    Gexha-bunjaku, Dafina
    Deva, Edona
    Handcock, Mark S.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2024, 18 (01): : 683 - 703
  • [34] ESTIMATION AND CORRECTION OF BIAS IN NETWORK SIMULATIONS BASED ON RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA
    Zhu, Lin
    Menzies, Nicolas A.
    Wang, Jianing
    Linas, Benjamin P.
    Goodreau, Steven M.
    Salomon, Joshua A.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E297 - E299
  • [35] Variance Estimation, Design Effects, and Sample Size Calculations for Respondent-Driven Sampling
    Matthew J. Salganik
    Journal of Urban Health, 2006, 83 : 98 - 112
  • [36] Caution on the Interpretation of Respondent-Driven Sampling Results
    Guimaraes, Mark D. C.
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2020, 36 (04) : 253 - 253
  • [37] Respondent-driven sampling in a syringe exchange setting
    Hakansson, Anders
    Isendahl, Pernilla
    Wallin, Camilla
    Berglund, Mats
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 40 (08) : 725 - 729
  • [38] Respondent-driven Sampling for Characterizing Unstructured Overlays
    Rasti, Amir H.
    Torkjazi, Mojtaba
    Rejaie, Reza
    Duffield, Nick
    Willinger, Walter
    Stutzbach, Daniel
    IEEE INFOCOM 2009 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 2701 - +
  • [39] Consistency for the tree bootstrap in respondent-driven sampling
    Green, A. K. B.
    McCormick, T. H.
    Raftery, A. E.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2020, 107 (02) : 497 - 504
  • [40] RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING: AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT METHODOLOGY
    Gile, Krista J.
    Handcock, Mark S.
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 40, 2010, 40 : 285 - 327