The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multimodal MRI Performance Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T in Recurrent GBM
    Ronan, Lara J.
    Hampton, Thomas
    Eskey, Clifford
    Fadul, Camilo
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 74 : S86 - S86
  • [42] Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Pediatric Spinal Cord at 1.5T: Preliminary Results
    Mohamed, F. B.
    Hunter, L. N.
    Barakat, N.
    Liu, C. -S. J.
    Sair, H.
    Samdani, A. F.
    Betz, R. R.
    Faro, S. H.
    Gaughan, J.
    Mulcahey, M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (02) : 339 - 345
  • [43] MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences
    Kornaat, PR
    Reeder, SB
    Koo, S
    Brittain, JH
    Yu, H
    Andriacchi, TP
    Gold, GE
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2005, 13 (04) : 338 - 344
  • [44] Functional MR imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T: A practical review
    Voss, Henning U.
    Zevin, Jason. D.
    McCandliss, Bruce D.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 285 - +
  • [45] MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging:: Comparing 3.0 T versus 1.5 T
    Dydak, Ulrike
    Schaer, Michael
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 269 - +
  • [46] Time-of-flight MR angiography: Comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging - Initial experience
    Willinek, WA
    Born, M
    Simon, B
    Tschampa, HJ
    Krautmacher, C
    Gieseke, J
    Urbach, H
    Textor, HJ
    Schild, HH
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) : 913 - 920
  • [47] Track density imaging using diffusion tensor imaging data from 1.5 T MRI scanner
    Kosker, Fatma Betul
    Gumus, Kazim Ziya
    Tokmakci, Mahmut
    Acer, Niyazi
    Senol, Serkan
    Bilgen, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2022, 30 (06) : 2044 - 2053
  • [48] Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of Skeletal Muscle: Optimization of b Value for Imaging at 1.5 T
    Saupe, Nadja
    White, Lawrence M.
    Stainsby, Jeffrey
    Tomlinson, George
    Sussman, Marshall S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (06) : W282 - W290
  • [49] Comparison of MRI scans of patients with optic neuritis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Nielsen, K
    Rostrup, E
    Frederiksen, J
    Knudsen, S
    Mathiesen, H
    Hansson, L
    Paulson, O
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (06) : A236 - A237
  • [50] MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T:: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model
    Roettgen, Rainer
    Herzog, Harry
    Bogen, Paul
    Freund, Thorsten
    Felix, Roland
    Bruhn, Harald
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2006, 30 (04) : 248 - 253