The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T pediatric brain imaging
    Zimmerman, RA
    Bilaniuk, LT
    Pollock, AN
    Feygin, T
    Zarnow, D
    Schwartz, ES
    Harris, C
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 229 - +
  • [22] MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences
    Kornaat, PR
    Reeder, SB
    Koo, S
    Brittain, J
    Andriacchi, TP
    Gold, GE
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2004, 12 : S59 - S59
  • [23] Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T:: Comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging
    Krüger, G
    Kastrup, A
    Glover, GH
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (04) : 595 - 604
  • [24] Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5 T, non-enhanced 3.0 T and blood pool enhanced 3.0 T imaging
    Gerretsen, S. C.
    Versluis, B.
    Bekkers, S. C. A. M.
    Leiner, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [25] 3.0 T diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of the testes in nonobstructive azoospermia
    Pappa, Ourania
    Astrakas, Loukas
    Anagnostou, Nikoletta
    Bougia, Christina K.
    Maliakas, Vasileios
    Sofikitis, Nikolaos
    Argyropoulou, Maria I.
    Tsili, Athina C.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (12) : 4543 - 4555
  • [26] MR imaging of cartilage in cadaveric wrists: Comparison between imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and gross pathologic inspection
    Saupe, Nadja
    Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
    Schmid, Marius R.
    Schertler, Thomas
    Manestar, Mirjana
    Weishaupt, Dominik
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) : 180 - 187
  • [27] Test-retest reliability of diffusion tensor imaging of the liver at 3.0 T
    Girometti, Rossano
    Maieron, Marta
    Lissandrello, Giovanni
    Bazzocchi, Massimo
    Zuiani, Chiara
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (06): : 489 - 497
  • [28] 3.0 T diffusion MR imaging
    Scarabino, T
    Nemore, E
    Esposito, E
    Di Salle, F
    Pollice, S
    Carriero, A
    Agati, R
    Salvolini, U
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2004, 17 (06): : 795 - 806
  • [29] Depiction of periprostatic nerve fibers by means of 1.5 T diffusion tensor imaging
    Valerio Di Paola
    Angelo Totaro
    Benedetta Gui
    Maura Miccò
    Elena Rodolfino
    Giacomo Avesani
    Camilla Panico
    Riccardo Gigli
    Adam Cybulski
    Vincenzo Valentini
    PierFrancesco Bassi
    Riccardo Manfredi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 2760 - 2769
  • [30] Depiction of periprostatic nerve fibers by means of 1.5 T diffusion tensor imaging
    Di Paola, Valerio
    Totaro, Angelo
    Gui, Benedetta
    Micco, Maura
    Rodolfino, Elena
    Avesani, Giacomo
    Panico, Camilla
    Gigli, Riccardo
    Cybulski, Adam
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Bassi, PierFrancesco
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (06) : 2760 - 2769