The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee
    Wong, Scott
    Steinbach, Lynne
    Zhao, Jian
    Stehling, Christoph
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    Link, Thomas M.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (08) : 761 - 769
  • [32] Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee
    Scott Wong
    Lynne Steinbach
    Jian Zhao
    Christoph Stehling
    C. Benjamin Ma
    Thomas M. Link
    Skeletal Radiology, 2009, 38 : 761 - 769
  • [33] Myelin Water Imaging: Implementation and Development at 3.0T and Comparison to 1.5T Measurements
    Kolind, Shannon H.
    Madler, Burkhard
    Fischer, Stefan
    Li, David K. B.
    MacKay, Alex L.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (01) : 106 - 115
  • [34] Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: A 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison
    Koktzoglou, I
    Chung, YC
    Mani, V
    Carroll, TJ
    Morasch, MD
    Mizsei, G
    Simonetti, OP
    Fayad, ZA
    Li, DB
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (05) : 699 - 705
  • [35] Diffusion-weighted MR neurography of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus: 3.0 T versus 1.5 T imaging
    Muertz, P.
    Kaschner, M.
    Lakghomi, A.
    Gieseke, J.
    Willinek, W. A.
    Schild, H. H.
    Thomas, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 696 - 702
  • [36] Single-shot fast spin-echo diffusion tensor imaging of the brain and spine with head and phased array coils at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Xu, D
    Henry, RG
    Mukherjee, P
    Carvajal, L
    Miller, SP
    Barkovich, AJ
    Vigneron, DB
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (06) : 751 - 759
  • [37] A comparison of simultaneous multislice and conventional diffusion tensor imaging techniques for ischemic stroke evaluation at 1.5T
    Culleton, Sinead
    Kolowori, Seyyed Kazem Hashemizadeh
    Roberts, John
    De Havenon, Adam
    Dibella, Edward
    Mcnally, J. Scott
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 96 (1141):
  • [38] Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
    Greenman, RL
    Shirosky, JE
    Mulkern, RV
    Rofsky, NM
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 17 (06) : 648 - 655
  • [39] Cardiac MR imaging and MR angiography in pediatric congenital heart disease: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
    KL Nguyen
    SN Khan
    J Moriarty
    K Mohajer
    P Renella
    G Satou
    I Ayad
    S Patel
    I Boechat
    P Finn
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [40] Comparison of Diffusion Metrics Obtained at 1.5T and 3T in Human Brain With Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging
    Shaw, Calvin B.
    Jensen, Jens H.
    Deardorff, Rachael L.
    Spampinato, Maria Vittoria
    Helpern, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (03) : 673 - 680