Functional MR imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T: A practical review

被引：14
|
作者：
Voss, Henning U.
Zevin, Jason. D.
McCandliss, Bruce D.
机构：
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Citigrp Biomed Imaging Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Sackler Inst Dev Psychobiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源：
NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA | 2006年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.008
中图分类号：
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号：
071006 ;
摘要：
This article reviews and discusses recent findings in functional MRI at 1.5 and 3.0 T magnetic field strengths, in research and clinical applications. Particular attention is paid to comparative studies and to an explanation of the physical and biological dependencies leading to potential gains and tradeoffs of functional scanning at magnets with a high field strength.
引用
收藏
页码：285 / +
页数：14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the spine
    Phalke, Vaishali V.
    Gujar, Sachin
    Quint, Douglas J.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 241 - +
  • [2] MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging:: Comparing 3.0 T versus 1.5 T
    Dydak, Ulrike
    Schaer, Michael
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 269 - +
  • [3] Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: Comparative review versus a 1.5-T system
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Kim, Ki Youn
    Jones, Alun C.
    de Becker, Jan
    van Cauteren, Marc
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (04) : e30
  • [4] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T imaging - Foreword
    Castillo, M
    Mukherji, SK
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : XIII - XIV
  • [5] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T imaging - Preface
    Roberts, TPL
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : XV - XVI
  • [6] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR angiography of the head and neck
    DeLano, MC
    DeMarco, JK
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 321 - +
  • [7] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T pediatric brain imaging
    Zimmerman, RA
    Bilaniuk, LT
    Pollock, AN
    Feygin, T
    Zarnow, D
    Schwartz, ES
    Harris, C
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 229 - +
  • [8] 3.0-T MR Imaging of the Abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Chang, Kevin J.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Bluemke, David A.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) : 1983 - 1998
  • [9] Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: Preliminary results in a porcine model
    Masi, JN
    Sell, CA
    Phan, C
    Han, E
    Newitt, D
    Steinbach, L
    Majumdar, S
    Link, TM
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (01) : 140 - 150
  • [10] Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee
    Wong, Scott
    Steinbach, Lynne
    Zhao, Jian
    Stehling, Christoph
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    Link, Thomas M.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (08) : 761 - 769
12345