A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Common, Jessica [1 ]
Abdullah, Peri [2 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, FRCPC, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
关键词
BI-RADS; 3; probably benign; mammography; breast ultrasound; cancer yield; PROBABLY BENIGN LESIONS; FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1177/08465371221121706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of breast lesions assessed at our institution as probably benign (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 3) with an expected malignancy rate of less than or equal to 2 %. Methods: Average-risk women with a BI-RADS 3 assessment following mammographic and/or ultrasound evaluation at our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2017 were included. Cancer yield was calculated within 90 days and at 6-month intervals up to 36 months. Results: Among 517 women (median age, 52 years; range, 13-89 years) with a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 349 (67.5 %) underwent biopsy or completed follow-up imaging up to 36 months. One hundred and 68 (32.5 %) were lost to follow-up. Thirty of 349 (8.6 %) had their imaging upgraded and underwent biopsy, yielding six cancers (cancer yield, 6 of 349 women [1.7 %]). Among 569 lesions assessed as BI-RADS 3, 92 (16.2 %) were characterized by morphologic features other than those validated as probably benign in prospective clinical studies. Fifty three of 517 women (10.3 %) had follow-up beyond 24 months, and 24 (4.6 %) had follow-up beyond 36 months. Conclusion: Overall utilization of the BI-RADS 3 assessment category at our institution is appropriate with a 1.7 % cancer yield. However, the rate of loss to follow-up, percentage of non-validated findings assessed as probably benign, and redundancy in follow-up protocols are too high, and warrant intervention. A patient handout explaining the BI-RADS 3 assessment category and automatic scheduling of follow-up studies have been implemented at our center to address loss to follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study
    Kankaya, Burak
    Buyukasik, Suleyman
    Altundal, Yusuf Emre
    Topcu, Feyza Sonmez
    Rahmanbakhsh, Paria
    Etemad, Ayden
    Kapan, Selin
    Alis, Halil
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2025, 17 : 115 - 122
  • [2] Breast pathology and mammography BI-RADS category correlation study - A single institute experience
    Hu, Shaomin
    Szymanski, James
    Khairy, Zeina
    Lo, Yungtai
    Wang, Yanhua
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2018, 35 : 11 - 15
  • [3] ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database
    Elezaby, Mai
    Li, Geng
    Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (02) : 416 - 422
  • [4] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Woo Kyung Moon
    Chung-Ming Lo
    Jung Min Chang
    Chiun-Sheng Huang
    Jeon-Hor Chen
    Ruey-Feng Chang
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2013, 26 : 1091 - 1098
  • [5] Outcomes of unconventional utilization of BI-RADS category 3 assessment at opportunistic screening
    Altas, Hilal
    Tureli, Derya
    Cengic, Ismet
    Kucukkaya, Fikret
    Aribal, Erkin
    Kaya, Handan
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (11) : 1304 - 1309
  • [6] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Lo, Chung-Ming
    Chang, Jung Min
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) : 1091 - 1098
  • [7] Breast MRI and BI-RADS category 3: Is it appropriate?
    Borders, Marisa H.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 107 - 108
  • [8] BI-RADS category 3 lesions on breast MRI
    Armani, Margot
    Lissavarid, Emilie
    Dyien, Bouchra
    Manceau, Julie
    Kahane, Melodie Bereby
    Malhaire, Caroline
    Tardivon, Anne
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2022, 32 (2-3) : 49 - 56
  • [9] Understanding BI-RADS Category 3
    Fazeli, Soudabeh
    Stepenosky, James
    Guirguis, Mary S.
    Adrada, Beatriz
    Rakow-Penner, Rebecca
    Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2025, 45 (01)
  • [10] BI-RADS® category 3: preamble
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2022, 32 (2-3) : 33 - 35