A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Common, Jessica [1 ]
Abdullah, Peri [2 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, FRCPC, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
关键词
BI-RADS; 3; probably benign; mammography; breast ultrasound; cancer yield; PROBABLY BENIGN LESIONS; FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1177/08465371221121706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of breast lesions assessed at our institution as probably benign (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 3) with an expected malignancy rate of less than or equal to 2 %. Methods: Average-risk women with a BI-RADS 3 assessment following mammographic and/or ultrasound evaluation at our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2017 were included. Cancer yield was calculated within 90 days and at 6-month intervals up to 36 months. Results: Among 517 women (median age, 52 years; range, 13-89 years) with a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 349 (67.5 %) underwent biopsy or completed follow-up imaging up to 36 months. One hundred and 68 (32.5 %) were lost to follow-up. Thirty of 349 (8.6 %) had their imaging upgraded and underwent biopsy, yielding six cancers (cancer yield, 6 of 349 women [1.7 %]). Among 569 lesions assessed as BI-RADS 3, 92 (16.2 %) were characterized by morphologic features other than those validated as probably benign in prospective clinical studies. Fifty three of 517 women (10.3 %) had follow-up beyond 24 months, and 24 (4.6 %) had follow-up beyond 36 months. Conclusion: Overall utilization of the BI-RADS 3 assessment category at our institution is appropriate with a 1.7 % cancer yield. However, the rate of loss to follow-up, percentage of non-validated findings assessed as probably benign, and redundancy in follow-up protocols are too high, and warrant intervention. A patient handout explaining the BI-RADS 3 assessment category and automatic scheduling of follow-up studies have been implemented at our center to address loss to follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The diagnostic value of MRI for architectural distortion categorized as BI-RADS category 3-4 by mammography
    Mei, Haibing
    Xu, Jian
    Yao, Gang
    Wang, Ying
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (04) : 1008 - 1018
  • [42] Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features
    Ha, Su Min
    Chae, Eun Young
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Hak Hee
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1087):
  • [43] Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi-RADS Scores
    Tariq, M. M.
    Khubaib, S.
    Imran, A. B.
    Ibrahim, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 4 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [44] Mammography breast density: an effective supplemental modality for the precise grading of ultrasound BI-RADS 4 categories
    Li, Wei-Min
    Sun, Qiu-Wei
    Fan, Xiao-Fang
    Zhang, Jun-Chao
    Xu, Ting
    Shen, Qi-Qi
    Jia, Lei
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (06) : 2010 - 2018
  • [45] Assessment of BI-RADS Category 4 Lesions Detected with Screening Mammography and Screening US: Utility of MR Imaging
    Strobel, Kevin
    Schrading, Simone
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barabasch, Alexandra
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [46] BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?
    Berg, Wendie A.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (05) : 527 - 538
  • [47] Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Gu, Yang
    Tian, Jiawei
    Ran, Haitao
    Ren, Weidong
    Chang, Cai
    Yuan, Jianjun
    Kang, Chunsong
    Deng, Youbin
    Wang, Hui
    Luo, Baoming
    Guo, Shenglan
    Zhou, Qi
    Xue, Ensheng
    Zhan, Weiwei
    Zhou, Qing
    Li, Jie
    Zhou, Ping
    Zhang, Chunquan
    Chen, Man
    Gu, Ying
    Xu, Jinfeng
    Chen, Wu
    Zhang, Yuhong
    Li, Jianchu
    Wang, Hongyan
    Jiang, Yuxin
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (04) : E407 - E416
  • [48] BI-RADS Category 3: Guidelines, Challenges, and the Path Forward
    Cohen, Ethan O.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2025, 45 (01)
  • [49] The Validity of the BI-RADS 3 Category Classification in the Modern Era
    Roudakova, Kseniya
    Sizer, Lina
    Carruthers, Catherine
    Seo, Dianne
    Carter, William
    Frazier, Thomas
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S438 - S439
  • [50] The use of CAD analysis in BI-RADS category 3 lesions
    Buchbinder, SS
    Leichter, IS
    Lederman, R
    Novak, B
    Bamberger, P
    Fields, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 602 - 602