A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Common, Jessica [1 ]
Abdullah, Peri [2 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, FRCPC, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
关键词
BI-RADS; 3; probably benign; mammography; breast ultrasound; cancer yield; PROBABLY BENIGN LESIONS; FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1177/08465371221121706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of breast lesions assessed at our institution as probably benign (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 3) with an expected malignancy rate of less than or equal to 2 %. Methods: Average-risk women with a BI-RADS 3 assessment following mammographic and/or ultrasound evaluation at our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2017 were included. Cancer yield was calculated within 90 days and at 6-month intervals up to 36 months. Results: Among 517 women (median age, 52 years; range, 13-89 years) with a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 349 (67.5 %) underwent biopsy or completed follow-up imaging up to 36 months. One hundred and 68 (32.5 %) were lost to follow-up. Thirty of 349 (8.6 %) had their imaging upgraded and underwent biopsy, yielding six cancers (cancer yield, 6 of 349 women [1.7 %]). Among 569 lesions assessed as BI-RADS 3, 92 (16.2 %) were characterized by morphologic features other than those validated as probably benign in prospective clinical studies. Fifty three of 517 women (10.3 %) had follow-up beyond 24 months, and 24 (4.6 %) had follow-up beyond 36 months. Conclusion: Overall utilization of the BI-RADS 3 assessment category at our institution is appropriate with a 1.7 % cancer yield. However, the rate of loss to follow-up, percentage of non-validated findings assessed as probably benign, and redundancy in follow-up protocols are too high, and warrant intervention. A patient handout explaining the BI-RADS 3 assessment category and automatic scheduling of follow-up studies have been implemented at our center to address loss to follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When classifying a BI-RADS category 3 lesion in breast MR imaging?
    Chapellier, Claire
    Marcotte-Bloch, Cecile
    Marcy, Pierre-Yves
    Benzaken, Thomas
    Balu-Maestro, Catherine
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2010, 20 (02) : 74 - 80
  • [22] MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast
    Gökalp, G
    Topal, U
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [23] CEUS Helps to Rerate Small Breast Tumors of BI-RADS Category 3 and Category 4
    Zhang, Jian-xing
    Cai, Li-shan
    Chen, Ling
    Dai, Jiu-long
    Song, Guang-hui
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [24] Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3)
    Gruber, R.
    Jaromi, S.
    Rudas, M.
    Pfarl, G.
    Riedl, C. C.
    Floery, D.
    Graf, O.
    Sickles, E. A.
    Helbich, T. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (03) : 398 - 403
  • [25] Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions
    Buchbinder, SS
    Leichter, IS
    Lederman, RB
    Novak, B
    Bamberger, PN
    Sklair-Levy, M
    Yarmish, G
    Fields, SI
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) : 820 - 823
  • [26] Combined mammography and breast ultrasound are required for a good accuracy of BI-RADS 4/5 results - findings of a breast imaging reference center
    Fasching, PA
    Wenkel, E
    Bani, MR
    Bautz, W
    Papadopoulos, T
    Beckmann, MW
    Schulz-Wendtland, R
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S88 - S89
  • [27] Accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography and their BI-RADS in detection of breast malignancy
    Ghaemian, Naser
    Tehrani, Neda Haji Ghazi
    Nabahati, Mehrdad
    CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04) : 573 - 579
  • [28] Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: Ultrasound
    Mendelson, EB
    Berg, WA
    Merritt, CRB
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 36 (03) : 217 - 225
  • [29] Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions
    Nicholson, Brandi T.
    LoRusso, Alexander P.
    Smolkin, Mark
    Bovbjerg, Viktor E.
    Petroni, Gina R.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (09) : 1143 - 1149
  • [30] Malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 mammographic lesions
    Hall, FM
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 918 - 919