Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kankaya, Burak [1 ]
Buyukasik, Suleyman [1 ]
Altundal, Yusuf Emre [1 ]
Topcu, Feyza Sonmez [2 ]
Rahmanbakhsh, Paria [1 ]
Etemad, Ayden [1 ]
Kapan, Selin [1 ]
Alis, Halil [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Besyol Mah Akasya Sok 4, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
breast ultrasonography; mammography; breast cancer; early diagnosis; BI-RADS classification; BREAST-CANCER;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S481201
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data. Results: Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended followup ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound
    Common, Jessica
    Abdullah, Peri
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2023, 74 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [2] Disparities Associated With Patient Adherence to BI-RADS 3 Assessment Follow-up Recommendations for Mammography and Ultrasound
    Nguyen, Derek L.
    Wilson, Benjamin M.
    Oluyemi, Eniola
    Myers, Kelly S.
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Panigrahi, Babita
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (12) : 1302 - 1309
  • [3] Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Barlow, William E.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Goodrich, Martha
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Harrington, Tory O.
    Geller, Berta
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (09) : 1118 - 1127
  • [4] Surveillance of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Lesions in Mammography: What Is The Right Follow-Up Protocol?
    Buch, Karen A.
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Carpentier, Bianca
    Cunningham, Deborah A.
    Stone, Michael
    Jaffe, Carl
    Quinn, Marie
    Gonzalez, Carlos
    LaVoye, Justine
    Hines, Neely
    Bloch, Boris Nicolas
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (02): : 168 - 174
  • [5] Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Berg, Jeremy M.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Rosenberg, Robert D.
    Lee, Cindy S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [6] Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions
    Varas, X
    Leborgne, JH
    Leborgne, F
    Mezzera, J
    Jaumandreu, S
    Leborgne, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 691 - 695
  • [7] Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS™ category III)
    Graf, O
    Helbich, TH
    Fuchsjäger, MH
    Hopf, G
    Morgun, M
    Graf, C
    Mallek, R
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (09): : 1251 - 1256
  • [8] Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound
    Chae, Eun Young
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Hak Hee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (03) : 666 - 672
  • [9] BI-RADS 3 (short-interval follow-up) assessment rate at diagnostic mammography: Correlation with recall rates and utilization as a performance benchmark
    Kirshenbaum, Kevin
    Harris, Kristin
    Harmon, Jenna
    Monge, John
    Dabbous, Firas
    Liu, Yangyang
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (07): : 1284 - 1288
  • [10] Follow-up results of BI-RADS 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study
    Aslan, Ozge
    Oktay, Aysenur
    Eroglu, Fatih
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03): : 175 - 182